From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
saket.dumbre@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
djbw@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
guohanjun@huawei.com, lenb@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
ira.weiny@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Michael.Zhao2@arm.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move estatus cache helpers
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 17:03:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529170348.0560da0e@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529-topics-ahmtib01-ras_ffh_arm_internal_review-v5-4-2e0500d42642@arm.com>
On Fri, 29 May 2026 10:50:44 +0100
Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com> wrote:
> Relocate the estatus cache allocation and lookup helpers from ghes.c into
> ghes_cper.c. This code move keeps the logic intact while making the cache
> implementation available to forthcoming users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>
A couple of minor things inline.
With the two I've called out tidied up
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_cper.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_cper.c
> index 8080e0f76dac..0a117f478afb 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes_cper.c
> @@ -13,10 +13,14 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +static void ghes_estatus_cache_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct ghes_estatus_cache *cache;
> + u32 len;
> +
> + cache = container_of(head, struct ghes_estatus_cache, rcu);
> + len = cper_estatus_len(GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_CACHE(cache));
> + len = GHES_ESTATUS_CACHE_LEN(len);
> + gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)cache, len);
> + atomic_dec(&ghes_estatus_cache_alloced);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +ghes_estatus_cache_add(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic,
> + struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
void ghes_estatus_cache_add(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic,
struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
is under 80 chars (and how you have it in the header!)
(RB assumes you fix this - or argue against perhaps because of a change in
a future patch)
> +{
> + unsigned long long now, duration, period, max_period = 0;
> + struct ghes_estatus_cache *cache, *new_cache;
> + struct ghes_estatus_cache __rcu *victim;
> + int i, slot = -1, count;
> +
> + new_cache = ghes_estatus_cache_alloc(generic, estatus);
> + if (!new_cache)
> + return;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + now = sched_clock();
> + for (i = 0; i < GHES_ESTATUS_CACHES_SIZE; i++) {
> + cache = rcu_dereference(ghes_estatus_caches[i]);
> + if (cache == NULL) {
> + slot = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + duration = now - cache->time_in;
> + if (duration >= GHES_ESTATUS_IN_CACHE_MAX_NSEC) {
> + slot = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + count = atomic_read(&cache->count);
> + period = duration;
> + do_div(period, (count + 1));
> + if (period > max_period) {
> + max_period = period;
> + slot = i;
> + }
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (slot != -1) {
If you even end up doing tidy up of this code, would be nicer to flip
the logic here and do an early return.
if (slot == -1)
return;
Then the rest is much less indented.
No need to do that in this series though as nothing 'wrong' with the
current code as such.
> + /*
> + * Use release semantics to ensure that ghes_estatus_cached()
> + * running on another CPU will see the updated cache fields if
> + * it can see the new value of the pointer.
> + */
> + victim = xchg_release(&ghes_estatus_caches[slot],
> + RCU_INITIALIZER(new_cache));
> +
> + /*
> + * At this point, victim may point to a cached item different
> + * from the one based on which we selected the slot. Instead of
> + * going to the loop again to pick another slot, let's just
> + * drop the other item anyway: this may cause a false cache
> + * miss later on, but that won't cause any problems.
> + */
> + if (victim)
> + call_rcu(&unrcu_pointer(victim)->rcu,
> + ghes_estatus_cache_rcu_free);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h b/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h
> index 6b7632cfaf66..1b5dbeca9bb6 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes_cper.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #ifndef ACPI_APEI_GHES_CPER_H
> #define ACPI_APEI_GHES_CPER_H
>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
Why? Nothing in in the types used in what is added to the header needs
it - maybe I'm suffering Friday syndrome. Seems like it belongs in another
patch or in a c file rather than the header.
(RB assumes this fixed or argued against)
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <acpi/ghes.h>
> @@ -54,6 +55,8 @@
> ((struct acpi_hest_generic_data *) \
> ((struct ghes_vendor_record_entry *)(vendor_entry) + 1))
>
> +extern struct gen_pool *ghes_estatus_pool;
> +
> static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes)
> {
> return ghes->generic->header.type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2;
> @@ -98,5 +101,8 @@ int __ghes_read_estatus(struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus,
> u64 buf_paddr, enum fixed_addresses fixmap_idx,
> size_t buf_len);
> #endif
> +int ghes_estatus_cached(struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus);
> +void ghes_estatus_cache_add(struct acpi_hest_generic *generic,
> + struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus);
>
> #endif /* ACPI_APEI_GHES_CPER_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 9:50 [PATCH v5 00/10] ACPI: APEI: share GHES CPER helpers and add DT FFH provider Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: share macros via a private header Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 15:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move CPER read helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move GHESv2 ack and alloc helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 15:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move estatus cache helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move vendor record helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 16:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] ACPI: APEI: GHES: move CXL CPER helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] ACPI: APEI: introduce GHES helper Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 16:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] ACPI: APEI: share GHES CPER helpers Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 10:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 16:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] dt-bindings: firmware: add arm,ras-cper Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 16:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] RAS: add firmware-first CPER provider Ahmed Tiba
2026-05-29 11:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 17:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-29 16:36 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] ACPI: APEI: share GHES CPER helpers and add DT FFH provider Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260529170348.0560da0e@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com \
--cc=Michael.Zhao2@arm.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ahmed.tiba@arm.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox