From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay"
<devnull+jerome.debretagne.gmail.com@kernel.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Enable the eDP display
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 16:27:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604162751.AD6AE1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604-surface-sp9-5g-for-next-v3-2-6aa6f6612c10@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The commit silently removes the `status = "okay";` override for the `&dispcc1` node and the `regulator-always-on` property from the `vreg_l6b` regulator without mentioning these functional changes in the commit message.
--
commit 225c01f9a1d48e2b3f638fa8c5a506daa682de98
Author: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Enable the eDP display
This commit adds the vreg_edp_3p3, edp_reg_en, and mdss0_dp3 nodes
to enable the eDP-based LCD display on the Surface Pro 9 5G.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-microsoft-arcata.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-microsoft-arcata.dts
> index f24f60dc73afe..476e17415da27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-microsoft-arcata.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-microsoft-arcata.dts
[ ... ]
> @@ -344,7 +360,6 @@ vreg_l6b: ldo6 {
> regulator-max-microvolt = <880000>;
> regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
> regulator-boot-on;
> - regulator-always-on; // FIXME: VDD_A_EDP_0_0P9
[Severity: Medium]
The removal of regulator-always-on allows dynamic power management, which
seems correct for eDP enablement. Could this functional power management
cleanup be documented in the commit message?
> };
> };
>
[ ... ]
> @@ -448,10 +463,6 @@ &dispcc0 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> -&dispcc1 {
> - status = "okay";
> -};
> -
[Severity: Medium]
Is the silent removal of the dispcc1 status override intentional?
Disabling the clock controller is a functional change. Should it be
mentioned in the commit message to clarify the patch's impact and aid
future bisectability?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604-surface-sp9-5g-for-next-v3-0-6aa6f6612c10@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 16:18 [PATCH v3 00/10] Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G update Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Enable backlight Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Enable the eDP display Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: add USB-C orientation GPIOs Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Fix top USB-C DP alt mode Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Enable 4-lane DP support Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Add volume up/down GPIO keys Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Add lid switch Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: model the PMU of the on-board wcn6855 Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Switch to uefi rtc offset Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2026-06-04 16:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-arcata: Drop duplicate DMIC supplies Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604162751.AD6AE1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+jerome.debretagne.gmail.com@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox