From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 03/12] net: phylink: add phylink_release_pcs() to externally release a PCS
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:16:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610161625.272F61F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609151212.29469-4-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unsynchronized modification of `pl->pcs_list` and TOCTOU access to `pl->pcs` in `phylink_release_pcs()` leads to data races, list corruption, and use-after-free.
- [High] `phylink_release_pcs()` silently fails to remove the PCS from `pl->pcs_list` if the interface is stopped, leading to a Use-After-Free.
- [Medium] Releasing an actively running PCS bypasses `phylink_pcs_disable()`, leaving the hardware permanently enabled.
--
commit ef373ddee33a54496ae5ebacb3521d9195428672
Author: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
net: phylink: add phylink_release_pcs() to externally release a PCS
Add phylink_release_pcs() to externally release a PCS from a phylink
instance. This can be used to handle case when a single PCS needs to be
removed and the phylink instance needs to be refreshed.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 4d6ffda0cdd61..b45bee9273007 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> @@ -923,6 +923,55 @@ static void phylink_resolve_an_pause(struct phylink_link_state *state)
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * phylink_release_pcs - Removes a PCS from the phylink PCS available list
> + * @pcs: a pointer to the phylink_pcs struct to be released
> + *
> + * This function release a PCS from the phylink PCS available list if
> + * actually in use. It also refreshes the supported interfaces of the
> + * phylink instance by copying the supported interfaces from the phylink
> + * conf and merging the supported interfaces of the remaining available PCS
> + * in the list and trigger a resolve.
> + */
> +void phylink_release_pcs(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
> +{
> + struct phylink *pl;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + pl = pcs->phylink;
> + if (!pl)
> + return;
[Severity: High]
Does this early return cause a use-after-free if the interface is stopped?
When the interface is brought down, phylink_stop() clears pcs->phylink = NULL
for all available PCS instances, while keeping them linked in pl->pcs_list.
If phylink_release_pcs() is called while the interface is stopped, it encounters
a NULL pointer here and returns immediately without executing
list_del(&pcs->list). The caller likely assumes the PCS was successfully
detached and frees its memory, leaving a dangling pointer in pl->pcs_list.
When the interface is later brought up, phylink_start() will iterate over
pl->pcs_list and dereference the freed memory.
> +
> + list_del(&pcs->list);
> + pcs->phylink = NULL;
> +
> + /* Check if we are removing the PCS currently
> + * in use by phylink. If this is the case,
> + * force phylink resolve to reconfigure the interface
> + * mode and set the phylink PCS to NULL.
> + */
> + if (pl->pcs == pcs) {
[Severity: High]
Can modifying the list and checking pl->pcs outside the state_mutex race with
the workqueue?
While this function enforces the RTNL lock, pl->pcs_list is concurrently
traversed by phylink_major_config() from the phylink_resolve workqueue, which
holds only pl->state_mutex. Modifying the list outside of pl->state_mutex could
cause the workqueue to dereference LIST_POISON1.
Additionally, checking if (pl->pcs == pcs) before acquiring state_mutex creates
a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use race. A concurrent phylink_resolve could update
pl->pcs between the lockless check and acquiring state_mutex, causing this code
to inadvertently clear a newly configured PCS.
> + mutex_lock(&pl->state_mutex);
> +
> + pl->force_major_config = true;
> + pl->pcs = NULL;
[Severity: Medium]
If pl->pcs is cleared to NULL here, will the released PCS ever be cleanly
disabled?
During the subsequent reconfiguration triggered by phylink_run_resolve(),
phylink_major_config() detects a PCS change and attempts to disable the old PCS
by calling phylink_pcs_disable(pl->pcs).
However, since pl->pcs was already cleared to NULL here, the
pcs->ops->pcs_disable() callback will never be invoked for the released PCS,
leaving it hardware-enabled.
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pl->state_mutex);
> + }
> +
> + /* Refresh supported interfaces */
> + phy_interface_copy(pl->supported_interfaces,
> + pl->config->supported_interfaces);
> + list_for_each_entry(pcs, &pl->pcs_list, list)
> + phy_interface_or(pl->supported_interfaces,
> + pl->supported_interfaces,
> + pcs->supported_interfaces);
> +
> + phylink_run_resolve(pl);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phylink_release_pcs);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609151212.29469-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 15:11 [PATCH net-next v6 00/12] net: pcs: Introduce support for fwnode PCS Christian Marangi
2026-06-09 15:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/12] net: phylink: keep and use MAC supported_interfaces in phylink struct Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/12] net: phylink: introduce internal phylink PCS handling Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:11 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/12] net: phylink: add phylink_release_pcs() to externally release a PCS Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/12] net: pcs: implement Firmware node support for PCS driver Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/12] net: phylink: support late PCS provider attach Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/12] net: Document PCS subsystem Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/12] MAINTAINERS: add myself as PCS subsystem maintainer Christian Marangi
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/12] of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for "pcs-handle" Christian Marangi
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/12] net: phylink: add .pcs_link_down PCS OP Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/12] dt-bindings: net: pcs: Document support for Airoha Ethernet PCS Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/12] net: pcs: airoha: add PCS driver for Airoha AN7581 SoC Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next v6 12/12] net: airoha: add phylink support Christian Marangi
2026-06-09 15:29 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-09 23:51 ` Christian Marangi
2026-06-10 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610161625.272F61F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox