From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Salih Erim" <salih.erim@amd.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] iio: adc: versal-sysmon: add oversampling support
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:08:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616140847.1695C1F00ADE@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616131559.3029543-6-salih.erim@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Static temperature channels are missing the oversampling ratio info mask, rendering it unavailable if no dynamic temperature satellites are present.
- [Medium] The driver's cached oversampling state is initialized to 1 without synchronizing with the hardware state.
--
commit 81f60069d7c6ab5d01862c8402ee14a0ef2ad23e
Author: Salih Erim <salih.erim@amd.com>
iio: adc: versal-sysmon: add oversampling support
Add support for reading and writing the oversampling ratio through
the IIO oversampling_ratio attribute. The hardware supports averaging
2, 4, 8, or 16 samples, plus a ratio of 1 (no averaging).
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/versal-sysmon-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/versal-sysmon-core.c
> index 8d567f9fa05d7..309c39b515f6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/versal-sysmon-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/versal-sysmon-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -787,7 +932,11 @@ static int sysmon_parse_fw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct device *dev, int ir
> .address = SYSMON_TEMP_SAT_BASE +
> (reg - 1) * SYSMON_REG_STRIDE,
> .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> - .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_type =
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_type_available =
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO),
> .datasheet_name = label,
> };
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Since the dynamically parsed temperature channels get the oversampling ratio
masks here, should the static temperature channels defined via
SYSMON_CHAN_TEMP also be updated to include these masks?
If no dynamic temperature satellites are present, the static temperature
channels won't expose the in_temp_oversampling_ratio sysfs attribute,
preventing oversampling configuration for those default channels.
[ ... ]
> @@ -834,6 +983,8 @@ int devm_versal_sysmon_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
>
> sysmon = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> sysmon->regmap = regmap;
> + sysmon->temp_oversampling = 1;
> + sysmon->supply_oversampling = 1;
[Severity: Medium]
Are these initial cached oversampling values guaranteed to match the hardware
state?
If a bootloader or a previous kernel instance left the SysMon configured with
a higher oversampling ratio, the IIO sysfs attribute will incorrectly report
1x oversampling while the hardware actively operates at the previous setting.
Should the driver read SYSMON_CONFIG to initialize this cache, or explicitly
write the default 1x value to the hardware to ensure the state is synchronized?
>
> ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &sysmon->lock);
> if (ret)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616131559.3029543-1-salih.erim@amd.com?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 13:15 [PATCH v8 0/5] iio: adc: add Versal SysMon driver Salih Erim
2026-06-16 13:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add xlnx,versal-sysmon binding Salih Erim
2026-06-16 13:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] iio: adc: add Versal SysMon driver Salih Erim
2026-06-16 13:15 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] iio: adc: versal-sysmon: add I2C driver Salih Erim
2026-06-16 13:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 13:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] iio: adc: versal-sysmon: add threshold event support Salih Erim
2026-06-16 13:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 13:15 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] iio: adc: versal-sysmon: add oversampling support Salih Erim
2026-06-16 14:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616140847.1695C1F00ADE@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=salih.erim@amd.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox