Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Luca Leonardo Scorcia" <l.scorcia@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8516/mt8167: Move compatibles from mt66xx to mt6795
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:04:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625110442.2BEFD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625104742.113803-2-l.scorcia@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] The patch series permanently breaks Device Tree backward compatibility (ABI breakage). By moving the mt8167 and mt8516 SoCs to the mt6795 bindings and pinctrl-paris.c driver, the schema now unconditionally requires `reg-names` and `gpio-ranges` and forbids the legacy `mediatek,pctl-regmap` layout. Furthermore, the updated driver calls `devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "base")` and fails with `-EINVAL` if `reg-names` is absent. Booting a new kernel with an older, previously valid device tree will fail to probe the pinctrl driver, breaking all GPIO-dependent devices.
--

commit ae4fde26bd3f120a43beccf98009171f05144eee
Author: Luca Leonardo Scorcia <l.scorcia@gmail.com>

dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8516/mt8167: Move compatibles from mt66xx to mt6795

Pinctrl settings for MediaTek mt8516-mt8167 SoCs use two reg base
addresses, one for GPIO and the other for EINT, as it is common in the
"Paris" pinctrl platform. This commit moves the mediatek,mt8516-pinctrl and
mediatek,mt8167-pinctrl compatible strings to the mt6795-pinctrl binding.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl.yaml
> index 9a937f414cc98..c703de72e1d52 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -15,7 +15,10 @@ description:
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    const: mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl
> +    enum:
> +      - mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl
> +      - mediatek,mt8167-pinctrl
> +      - mediatek,mt8516-pinctrl

[Severity: Critical]
Does moving these compatibles to this binding break Device Tree backward
compatibility?

The schema now unconditionally requires properties like reg-names and
gpio-ranges, and forbids the legacy mediatek,pctl-regmap layout without an
allOf: if-then conditional to accommodate older hardware descriptions.

Furthermore, the updated driver unconditionally requires the reg-names
property:

drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c:mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe() {
    ...
		hw->base[i] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev,
					hw->soc->base_names[i]);
    ...
}

Because older device trees lack the reg-names property, this call returns
-EINVAL and fails the probe.

Will booting a new kernel with an older device tree fail to probe the
pinctrl driver, breaking all GPIO-dependent peripherals?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260625104742.113803-1-l.scorcia@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25 10:46 [RFC PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: mediatek: mt8516-mt8167: Convert to Paris driver Luca Leonardo Scorcia
2026-06-25 10:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8516/mt8167: Move compatibles from mt66xx to mt6795 Luca Leonardo Scorcia
2026-06-25 11:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-25 10:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: mediatek: mt8516/mt8167: Migrate driver to pinctrl-paris platform Luca Leonardo Scorcia
2026-06-25 11:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 10:46 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: mt8516/mt8167: Update pinctrl nodes for the new paris driver Luca Leonardo Scorcia
2026-06-25 11:07   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260625110442.2BEFD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=l.scorcia@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox