Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gokul Praveen" <g-praveen@ti.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: Add PLL1 refclk to J784S4 SoC SERDES node
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:31:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629103110.B86F31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629102308.56616-2-g-praveen@ti.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Device Tree Binding Schema validation failure due to missing schema item for the third clock name.
--

commit c724dfc4b95310a6b37f143a703b52391002ee90
Author: Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@ti.com>

arm64: dts: ti: Add PLL1 refclk to J784S4 SoC SERDES node

This commit adds the PLL1 refclk to the clocks and clock-names parameters
of the SERDES2 node. It updates both the devicetree binding schema and the
k3-j784s4-main.dtsi file to reflect the new clock.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      items:
>        - const: refclk
> -      - enum: [ pll1_refclk, phy_en_refclk ]
> +      - enum: [refclk, pll1_refclk, phy_en_refclk ]

[Severity: Low]
Does this schema correctly allow a third clock name?

The items list here only defines two elements (the const and the enum). Under 
dt-schema rules, any device tree node specifying a third element will fail 
validation because there is no corresponding schema item defined for it in the 
items array.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> @@ -122,8 +122,9 @@ serdes2: serdes@5020000 {
>  			resets = <&serdes_wiz2 0>;
>  			reset-names = "torrent_reset";
>  			clocks = <&serdes_wiz2 TI_WIZ_PLL0_REFCLK>,
> +				 <&serdes_wiz2 TI_WIZ_PLL1_REFCLK>,
>  				 <&serdes_wiz2 TI_WIZ_PHY_EN_REFCLK>;
> -			clock-names = "refclk", "phy_en_refclk";
> +			clock-names = "refclk","pll1_refclk", "phy_en_refclk";

[Severity: Low]
Will this trigger a dtbs_check warning?

Since the device tree node is updated to supply 3 clock-names, but the
YAML schema items list above is still implicitly limited to 2 definitions,
this will likely cause a build-time validation failure.

Should a third item be added to the YAML items array to match this 3-clock
configuration?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629102308.56616-1-g-praveen@ti.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 10:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for dual port USXGMII+SGMII Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: Add PLL1 refclk to J784S4 SoC SERDES node Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 10:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-29 10:47     ` Gokul Praveen
2026-06-30  7:13   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-30 12:59     ` Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Fix MAC configuration for SGMII mode Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 12:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 22:12   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-30 12:55     ` Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Add overlay for dual port USXGMII+SGMII mode Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 10:58     ` Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for dual port USXGMII+SGMII Siddharth Vadapalli
2026-06-29 11:10   ` Gokul Praveen
2026-06-29 11:20     ` Siddharth Vadapalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260629103110.B86F31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=g-praveen@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox