From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 13:05:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701130558.1954E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701122024.19557-7-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Double unregister of the PHY platform device on error paths.
- [High] HDMI audio codec platform device is leaked due to a copy-paste error.
- [High] Ignoring the return value of phy_power_on() causes an unbalanced phy_power_off() call if power-on fails.
--
commit 6e6e078245707d85aa500b0a872e31948a456e4f
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences
The PHY driver has gained support for .power_on() and .power_off()
callbacks: use the API provided phy_power_on(), phy_power_off()
functions instead of writing into PHY registers from this driver.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> index 97bce8966a1f3..3b5348ab487de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> @@ -1425,21 +1427,37 @@ static void mtk_dp_power_enable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> SW_RST_B_PHYD, SW_RST_B_PHYD);
> mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE,
> DP_PWR_STATE_BANDGAP_TPLL, DP_PWR_STATE_MASK);
> - mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL,
> - RG_DPAUX_RX_VALID_DEGLITCH_EN | RG_XTP_GLB_CKDET_EN |
> - RG_DPAUX_RX_EN);
> - mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034, 0, DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN);
> +
> + if (mtk_dp->phy_dev) {
> + mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL,
> + RG_DPAUX_RX_VALID_DEGLITCH_EN | RG_XTP_GLB_CKDET_EN |
> + RG_DPAUX_RX_EN);
> + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034, 0, DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN);
> + } else {
> + ret = phy_power_on(mtk_dp->phy);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(mtk_dp->dev, "Could not power on PHY!\n");
[Severity: High]
Does ignoring the return value of phy_power_on() cause an unbalanced
phy_power_off() call if power-on fails?
If phy_power_on() fails, the error is swallowed and only a warning is printed.
The function returns normally, leaving the PHY core's internal power_count at 0.
> + }
> }
>
> static void mtk_dp_power_disable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE, 0);
>
> - mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034,
> + if (unlikely(mtk_dp->phy_dev)) {
> + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034,
> DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN, DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN);
>
> - /* Disable RX */
> - mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL, 0);
> + /* Disable RX */
> + mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL, 0);
> + } else {
> + ret = phy_power_off(mtk_dp->phy);
[Severity: High]
Can this unbalanced teardown lead to refcount underflows?
This function unconditionally calls phy_power_off() even if the initial
power-on failed. This decrements power_count to -1 and attempts to disable
regulators and release PM runtime references that were never actually acquired.
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(mtk_dp->dev, "Could not power off PHY!\n");
> + }
> +
> mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_MEM_PD,
> 0x550 | FUSE_SEL | MEM_ISO_EN);
> }
[ ... ]
The following issues were introduced earlier in this patch series in commit
"drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Fix hdmi codec and phy driver unregistration":
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> @@ -2680,18 +2687,29 @@ static int mtk_dp_register_audio_driver(struct device *dev)
> .data = mtk_dp,
> .no_capture_mute = 1,
> };
> + int ret;
>
> mtk_dp->audio_pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev,
> HDMI_CODEC_DRV_NAME,
> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> &codec_data,
> sizeof(codec_data));
> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(mtk_dp->audio_pdev);
> + if (IS_ERR(mtk_dp->audio_pdev))
> + return PTR_ERR(mtk_dp->audio_pdev);
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs, mtk_dp->phy_dev);
[Severity: High]
Does this devm action incorrectly register mtk_dp->phy_dev for cleanup instead
of the newly created mtk_dp->audio_pdev?
Since this function is called before mtk_dp_register_phy(), mtk_dp->phy_dev is
NULL. When the driver is unbound, devres executes mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs(NULL),
and the actual audio_pdev is permanently leaked.
> + if (ret) {
> + platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->audio_pdev);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to add codec unregister devm action");
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int mtk_dp_register_phy(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> {
> struct device *dev = mtk_dp->dev;
> + int ret;
>
> mtk_dp->phy_dev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "mediatek-dp-phy",
> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> @@ -2701,6 +2719,13 @@ static int mtk_dp_register_phy(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(mtk_dp->phy_dev),
> "Failed to create device mediatek-dp-phy\n");
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs, mtk_dp->phy_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->phy_dev);
[Severity: High]
Does this error path cause a double unregister of the PHY platform device?
If devm_add_action_or_reset() fails, it automatically executes the cleanup
action (mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs), which calls
platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->phy_dev). The error handler then manually
calls platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->phy_dev) a second time.
Alternatively, if devm_add_action_or_reset() succeeds but devm_phy_get() fails
later in the function, the error handler manually unregisters the device. The
probe then fails, and devres cleans up by executing the registered action,
unregistering the device a second time.
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to add phy unregister devm action");
> + }
> +
> mtk_dp_get_calibration_data(mtk_dp);
>
> mtk_dp->phy = devm_phy_get(&mtk_dp->phy_dev->dev, "dp");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701122024.19557-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 12:20 [PATCH 00/11] drm: MediaTek DisplayPort cleanups and MT8196 eDP AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dp: Deprecate nvmem efuse data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dp: Add compatible for MT8196 eDP AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Fix hdmi codec and phy driver unregistration AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Clarify SMC eDP/DP video unmute commands AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Rework register offsets for proper PHY usage AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for PHY from devicetree AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Move max link rate to SoC specific data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for HotPlug Detection in DP AUX AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for eDP1.5 IPs and MT8196 SoC AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Clarify XTAL freq and Debounce registers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 14:09 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701130558.1954E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox