From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Move max link rate to SoC specific data
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 13:34:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701133448.5FD141F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701122024.19557-9-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] mode_valid and atomic_get_input_bus_fmts validate display modes against an unbounded, stale, or uninitialized link rate, bypassing Device Tree limits and DPCD capabilities.
--
commit 4683d3daece6ab3ba3c7c82ebff7364e878794fb
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: Wed Jul 1 12:20:21 2026 +0000
drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Move max link rate to SoC specific data
This patch moves the maximum link rate to the SoC specific data structure
instead of statically assigning it to DP_LINK_BW_5_4 during initialization.
This prepares the driver for the MT8196 SoC which supports higher link rates.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> index bf3a4b15f3ec0..5272e717bfda0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1481,7 +1482,7 @@ static void mtk_dp_initialize_priv_data(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> {
> bool plugged_in = (mtk_dp->bridge.type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP);
>
> - mtk_dp->train_info.link_rate = DP_LINK_BW_5_4;
> + mtk_dp->train_info.link_rate = mtk_dp->data->hw_max_link_rate;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does setting the link rate
here cause mode validation to falsely accept unsupported high-bandwidth modes?
Looking at mtk_dp_bridge_mode_valid() in drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c,
it calculates available bandwidth using the unnegotiated train_info.link_rate:
u32 rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(mtk_dp->train_info.link_rate) *
lane_count_min;
A similar calculation occurs in mtk_dp_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts().
Since train_info.link_rate is initialized here to the SoC's absolute maximum
(and previously statically to DP_LINK_BW_5_4), it bypasses the board-specific
Device Tree constraint mtk_dp->max_linkrate and the sink capabilities in rx_cap.
When the mode is actually committed, mtk_dp_training() properly limits the
link rate to mtk_dp->max_linkrate and trains at a lower bandwidth. Won't this
leave the hardware unable to sustain the falsely validated high-bandwidth
display mode, resulting in a blank screen or corrupted output due to bandwidth
exhaustion?
Because this patch will introduce even higher initial values for future SoCs
like MT8196, will this cause a wider range of unsupported modes to be falsely
validated?
> mtk_dp->train_info.lane_count = mtk_dp->max_lanes;
> mtk_dp->train_info.cable_plugged_in = plugged_in;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701122024.19557-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 12:20 [PATCH 00/11] drm: MediaTek DisplayPort cleanups and MT8196 eDP AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dp: Deprecate nvmem efuse data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dp: Add compatible for MT8196 eDP AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Fix hdmi codec and phy driver unregistration AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Clarify SMC eDP/DP video unmute commands AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Rework register offsets for proper PHY usage AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for PHY from devicetree AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Move max link rate to SoC specific data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for HotPlug Detection in DP AUX AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for eDP1.5 IPs and MT8196 SoC AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Clarify XTAL freq and Debounce registers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 14:09 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701133448.5FD141F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox