From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
<devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: rodrigo.alencar@analog.com,
Michael Auchter <michael.auchter@ni.com>,
linux@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] iio: dac: ad5686: refactor command/data macros
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 00:29:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706002940.4cb95cbb@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260705-ad5686-new-features-v6-1-269594c7aae5@analog.com>
On Sun, 05 Jul 2026 12:38:56 +0100
Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay <devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@analog.com>
>
> Replace usage of bit shifting macros for FIELD_PREP(), which would not
> ignore bit masking when preparing SPI/I2C commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@analog.com>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5686.h b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5686.h
> index c424720f8f72..0d1bbf110926 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5686.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5686.h
> @@ -14,13 +14,6 @@
>
> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>
> -#define AD5310_CMD(x) ((x) << 12)
> -
> -#define AD5683_DATA(x) ((x) << 4)
> -
> -#define AD5686_ADDR(x) ((x) << 16)
> -#define AD5686_CMD(x) ((x) << 20)
> -
> #define AD5686_ADDR_DAC(chan) (0x1 << (chan))
> #define AD5686_ADDR_ALL_DAC 0xF
>
> @@ -38,12 +31,18 @@
> #define AD5686_CMD_CONTROL_REG 0x4
> #define AD5686_CMD_READBACK_ENABLE_V2 0x5
>
> +#define AD5310_CMD_MSK GENMASK(15, 12)
> +#define AD5310_DATA_MSK GENMASK(11, 0)
There is a sashiko bug report on the final patch that got me looking at
these - it's a false positive but took some time to figure out why
it was getting confused. I think we need to do something to make it
more obvious what is going on..
> #define AD5310_REF_BIT_MSK BIT(8)
This is bit 8 of DATA - here DATA is 0 aligned so no mismatch.
> #define AD5310_PD_MSK GENMASK(10, 9)
>
> +#define AD5683_DATA_MSK GENMASK(19, 4)
> #define AD5683_REF_BIT_MSK BIT(12)
and this is bit 12 of AD5683_DATA rather than BIT(12) of the the whole thing
(given the 4 don't care bits.)
Could either rename things to
#define AD5683_DATA_REF_BIT_MSK() or add a comment on the bit positions
in the overall message - which will then align with the ones of the datasheet.
where ref is DB16.
> #define AD5683_PD_MSK GENMASK(14, 13)
>
> +#define AD5686_CMD_MSK GENMASK(23, 20)
> +#define AD5686_ADDR_MSK GENMASK(19, 16)
> +#define AD5686_DATA_MSK GENMASK(15, 0)
> #define AD5686_REF_BIT_MSK BIT(0)
> #define AD5686_PD_MSK GENMASK(1, 0)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-05 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-05 11:38 [PATCH v6 0/6] New features for the AD5686 IIO driver Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] iio: dac: ad5686: refactor command/data macros Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 14:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-05 23:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-05 23:29 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-07-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] iio: dac: ad5686: introduce sync operation Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] iio: dac: ad5686: implement new sync() op for the spi bus Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] iio: dac: ad5686: read_raw/write_raw: use guard(mutex)() Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 11:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-05 11:39 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iio: dac: ad5686: add triggered buffer support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 11:39 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] iio: dac: ad5686: add gain control support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-05 11:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] New features for the AD5686 IIO driver Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706002940.4cb95cbb@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@analog.com \
--cc=michael.auchter@ni.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.alencar@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox