Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64: dts: imx93-kontron: Enable ELE firmware driver

[Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 10:43:56AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> On 14.07.26 10:32, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> >> Hi Francesco,
> >>
> >> On 14.07.26 08:59, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> >>> Hello Frieder,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 04:53:46PM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> >>>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add the ELE firmware API node and pass its handle to the OCOTP
> >>>> driver. This allows us to gain read/write access to the OTP fuses.
> >>>
> >>> This seems something we should have in the soc dtsi (imx93/imx91), it
> >>> does not seems board specific.
> >>
> >> My original intention was to move as much as possible into the SoC dtsi.
> >> The problem is that the memory node is somewhat board specific due to
> >> the DDR. And I can't move the firmware node into the SoC dtsi and assign
> >> the memory node in the board dts as the checks for all boards not
> >> specifying a memory node would fail then.
> > 
> > What is the reason to have this memory address different on various
> > boards? Can we have a default in the soc dtsi, and allow the board to
> > override the address if needed?
> 
> There is no real point in having different addresses on different
> boards. But the node describes memory that is physically on the board
> and not on the SoC. And I think that is why DT maintainers want to have
> it in the board DT. It's the same with the memory nodes for the
> remoteproc drivers to communicate with the Cortex M-Cores in the i.MX.
> But maybe I'm wrong and if there is a possibility to move this to the
> SoC DT I will definitely take it.
> 
> > 
> > Or can't you add the address in all the boards, and keep everything else
> > in the soc dtsi?
> This could be a possible way, yes. In that case maybe we could even
> create a generic dtsi to contain such defaults for all boards.

I would go for this solution, we could have something like
`k3-am62-ti-ipc-firmware.dtsi`, include it from all the boards, have a
sane default memory address, and have an easy way to override the memory
address from the board dts, if needed.

Francesco