From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] usb: hub: Power on connected M.2 E-key connectors with power sequencing API
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:28:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715092814.21C6C1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715085348.3457359-11-wenst@chromium.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Concurrent sysfs `disable` read or write can dereference an `ERR_PTR` if `usb_hub_port_pwrseq_get()` fails.
- [High] usb_hub_set_port_power() accesses the dynamically allocated hub->ports array, which can be freed concurrently by hub_disconnect().
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v5 10/16] usb: hub: Power on connected M.2 E-key connectors with power sequencing API ---
commit e0346a1be7fb5d1254f3498bb6d857dd5db5a9d7
Author: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Subject: usb: hub: Power on connected M.2 E-key connectors with power sequencing API
This patch integrates the power sequencing API with USB ports to support M.2
E-key connectors. It manages power sequencing during port creation, removal,
and power state changes.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index 10f15b40fcc55..298fb68c6afc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -887,15 +898,22 @@ int usb_hub_set_port_power(struct usb_device *hdev, struct usb_hub *hub,
> int port1, bool set)
> {
> + struct usb_port *pwrseq_port = hub->ports[port1 - 1];
[Severity: High]
Can this code trigger a use-after-free on the hub->ports array?
The sysfs disable_store callback uses sysfs_break_active_protection()
to avoid deadlocks, meaning it prevents device_unregister() from waiting
for the callback to finish.
If hub_probe() fails and triggers hub_disconnect() concurrently,
hub_disconnect() will call device_unregister() which returns immediately.
Then hub_disconnect() unconditionally frees the hub->ports array:
hub_disconnect() {
...
kfree(hub->ports);
}
Meanwhile, disable_store() can continue and call usb_hub_set_port_power(),
which now accesses the freed hub->ports array. Prior to this change,
usb_hub_set_port_power() only accessed inline fields of the refcounted
hub struct.
Is there a way to safely access the port here without racing against the array
being freed?
> + int ret;
>
> + ret = usb_hub_set_port_pwrseq(pwrseq_port, set);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/port.c b/drivers/usb/core/port.c
> index 19913ad3598b3..430fc90232502 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/port.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -831,6 +879,13 @@ int usb_hub_create_port_device(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1)
> goto err_put_kn;
> }
>
> + port_dev->pwrseq = usb_hub_port_pwrseq_get(port_dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(port_dev->pwrseq)) {
> + retval = dev_err_probe(&port_dev->dev, PTR_ERR(port_dev->pwrseq),
> + "failed to get power sequencing descriptor\n");
> + goto err_put_kn;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Could this temporarily expose an ERR_PTR to concurrent sysfs operations?
The port device is registered earlier in this function via device_register(),
exposing its sysfs attributes (like disable) before usb_hub_port_pwrseq_get()
is called.
If acquiring the power sequencer fails and returns an ERR_PTR,
port_dev->pwrseq will hold this ERR_PTR. Because sysfs unregistration waits
for active callbacks on the error path, a concurrent read or write to the
disable attribute could access port_dev->pwrseq while it holds an error value.
This ERR_PTR would then be passed to usb_port_is_power_on() or
usb_hub_set_port_pwrseq(), which call the power sequencer APIs:
static int usb_hub_set_port_pwrseq(struct usb_port *port, bool on)
{
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POWER_SEQUENCING))
return 0;
if (on)
return pwrseq_power_on(port->pwrseq);
return pwrseq_power_off(port->pwrseq);
}
Since the pwrseq_power_* APIs do not check for ERR_PTR, would this cause
a panic when dereferencing the pointer?
> +
> retval = component_add(&port_dev->dev, &connector_ops);
> if (retval) {
> dev_warn(&port_dev->dev, "failed to add component\n");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715085348.3457359-1-wenst@chromium.org?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 8:53 [PATCH v5 00/16] arm64: mediatek: Add M.2 E-key slot on Chromebooks Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] device property: Add fwnode_graph_get_port_by_id() Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] device property: Add fwnode_graph_get_next_port_endpoint() Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] power: sequencing: Add pwrseq_power_is_on() Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 9:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 12:10 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] usb: hub: Use assign_bit() in usb_hub_set_port_power() Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] usb: hub: Return actual error from hub_configure() in hub_probe() Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] usb: hub: Associate port@ fwnode with USB port device Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] usb: core: Move struct usb_port and related APIs to port.h Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] usb: hub: Pass |struct usb_port*| to usb_port_is_power_on() Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] usb: hub: Use usb_hub_set_port_power() to control port power everywhere Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] usb: hub: Power on connected M.2 E-key connectors with power sequencing API Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] dt-bindings: usb: mediatek,mtk-xhci: Switch to ports for USB connections Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] power: sequencing: pcie-m2: support matching on remote "port" node Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] power: sequencing: pcie-m2: Add usb and sdio targets for E-key connector Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] power: sequencing: pcie-m2: Split Bluetooth unit based on interface Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195-cherry: Add M.2 E-key slot Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-15 9:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8188-geralt: Add WiFi/BT as " Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715092814.21C6C1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox