From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] drm/mediatek: Implement Display Stream Compression support
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:02:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715120219.B11FD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715114916.19690-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 7 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Hardware Initialization Bypass due to skipped array element in DDP component loop.
- [High] DSC configuration is written after the component is started, causing pipeline corruption.
- [High] State leak of `dsc_config_done` breaks non-DSC display modes.
- [High] DSI clock lane timing register `DSI_HSTX_CKL_WC` is destroyed by being overwritten with the pixel payload word count.
- [High] Hardcoded 2x multiplier for DSC slice count results in incorrect DSI payload word count.
- [High] Bandwidth calculations use uncompressed bits-per-pixel (bpp), falsely rejecting valid DSC modes and misconfiguring PHY clocks.
- [Medium] Uninitialized variable `slice_chunk_size` is used for hardware configuration during DSI power-on.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v5 02/11] drm/mediatek: Implement Display Stream Compression support ---
commit e5bc691dc168426274a3882d1ba1c028fccf77c4
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: drm/mediatek: Implement Display Stream Compression support
This commit introduces Display Stream Compression (DSC) support for the
MediaTek display controller IP. It extracts DSC IP bypass setup from
mtk_ddp_comp into a new mtk_disp_dsc driver and adds DSC handling to the
mtk_dsi driver.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_crtc.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_crtc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -398,6 +401,17 @@ static int mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(struct mtk_crtc *mtk_crtc)
> if (!mtk_ddp_comp_add(mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i], mtk_crtc->mutex))
> mtk_mutex_add_comp(mtk_crtc->mutex,
> mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id);
> +
> + /* For now, only single DSI is supported */
> + if (mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id >= DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0 &&
> + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id <= DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3)
> + if (!comp_dsi)
> + comp_dsi = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i];
[Severity: High]
Does this loop skip checking the DSI component?
Looking at the loop definition in mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(), it iterates up to
ddp_comp_nr - 1. Since DSI is typically the sink and sits at the very end of
the pipeline, it is at index ddp_comp_nr - 1. This means the loop body
checking for DSI components never executes for it, leaving comp_dsi as NULL.
Consequently, the subsequent mtk_ddp_comp_dsc_setup() call is silently
bypassed.
> +
> + if (mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSC0 ||
> + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSC1)
> + if (!comp_dsc)
> + comp_dsc = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i];
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -413,6 +427,13 @@ static int mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(struct mtk_crtc *mtk_crtc)
> mtk_ddp_comp_start(comp);
> }
>
> + /* Setup the DSC if present, with the config coming from DSI */
> + if (comp_dsc && comp_dsi) {
> + dsc_cfg = mtk_dsi_get_dsc_config(comp_dsi->dev);
> + if (dsc_cfg)
> + mtk_ddp_comp_dsc_setup(comp_dsc, dsc_cfg);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Is mtk_ddp_comp_dsc_setup() called too late here?
The preceding loop calls mtk_ddp_comp_start(comp) for all components, which
starts the DSC in bypass mode. Then mtk_dsc_setup() disables the active DSC
engine:
writel(dsc_con & ~DSC_EN, disp_dsc->reg + DISP_REG_DSC_CON);
It then reconfigures and re-enables the engine. Could disabling and
reconfiguring the active component while the pipeline is already streaming
video data cause hardware hangs or stream corruption?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_dsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_dsc.c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_dsc.c
[ ... ]
> +void mtk_dsc_start(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dsc *disp_dsc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* If no DSC or config not done, set bypass mode */
> + if (!disp_dsc->dsc_config_done) {
> + mtk_ddp_write_mask(NULL, DSC_BYPASS, &disp_dsc->cmdq_reg,
> + disp_dsc->reg, DISP_REG_DSC_CON, DSC_BYPASS);
[Severity: High]
Does disp_dsc->dsc_config_done need to be cleared when the DSC is stopped?
When switching from a DSC mode to a non-DSC mode, mtk_dsc_stop() zeros
DISP_REG_DSC_CON but leaves dsc_config_done set to true. Later,
mtk_dsc_start() evaluates !disp_dsc->dsc_config_done as false and skips
writing the DSC_BYPASS bit.
Since mtk_dsc_stop() previously zeroed the register, DSC_BYPASS is 0,
leaving compression enabled on a pipeline that now expects uncompressed
video.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
[ ... ]
> -static void mtk_dsi_ps_control(struct mtk_dsi *dsi, bool config_vact)
> +static void mtk_dsi_ps_control_dsc(struct mtk_dsi *dsi, bool config_vact)
> +{
> + const struct mtk_dsi_driver_data *data = dsi->driver_data;
> + const u16 *reg_main = dsi->driver_data->reg_main;
> + const short dsi_buf_bpp = 3;
> + u32 ps_wc;
> +
> + /* Word count */
> + ps_wc = FIELD_PREP(DSI_PS_WC, 2 * dsi->dsc->slice_chunk_size);
[Severity: High]
Is it safe to hardcode the slice multiplier to 2?
If a DSC panel uses a different slice count, such as 1 or 4, this calculates
an incorrect payload word count. Should this dynamically multiply by
dsi->dsc->slice_count instead?
> +
> + if (config_vact) {
> + writel(FIELD_PREP(VACT_NL, dsi->vm.vactive),
> + dsi->regs + reg_main[DSI_VACT_NL]);
> + writel(ps_wc, dsi->regs + reg_main[DSI_HSTX_CKL_WC]);
[Severity: High]
Does this overwrite the clock lane timing configuration?
In mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(), the code calculates and writes intricate
clock timing to DSI_HSTX_CKL_WC via mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing_per_frame_lp().
Immediately after, it calls mtk_dsi_ps_control(dsi, true), which executes
this writel.
Could this destroy the previously calculated clock timing by completely
overwriting it with just the pixel payload word count?
[ ... ]
> @@ -741,12 +828,19 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>
> mtk_dsi_ps_control(dsi, true);
[Severity: Medium]
Is dsi->dsc->slice_chunk_size fully initialized before this call?
Here, mtk_dsi_ps_control(dsi, true) routes to mtk_dsi_ps_control_dsc(),
which reads dsi->dsc->slice_chunk_size.
However, the chunk size is only calculated later when
mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing() calls drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(dsc). Will
this result in uninitialized values being temporarily written to DSI hardware
registers during power-on?
[ ... ]
> @@ -883,6 +977,28 @@ mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> if (mode->clock * bpp / dsi->lanes > 1500000)
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
[Severity: High]
Does this bandwidth calculation falsely reject valid DSC modes?
The bpp value is calculated earlier using mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(),
which returns the uncompressed bits-per-pixel. Using the uncompressed bpp
for DSC modes calculates a much higher required bandwidth, which can exceed
hardware limits and reject legitimate modes.
Similarly, in mtk_dsi_poweron(), using the uncompressed bpp calculates
a data_rate that misconfigures the PHY clock. Should these calculations
use the compressed bpp (dsi->dsc->bits_per_pixel >> 4) when DSC is enabled?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715114916.19690-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 11:49 [PATCH v5 00/11] drm/mediatek: Add DSC, WDMA, MT8189/96 DSI support AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dsc: Add MT8196 compatible AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] drm/mediatek: Implement Display Stream Compression support AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 12:08 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dsi: Document MT8189 and MT8196 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Cleanup encoder if reset fails during bind AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Enable interrupt at component bind time AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 12:08 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Transfer register offsets to per-SoC const AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Add support for MT8189 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 12:12 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Add support for MT8196 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 12:16 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Enable PM Runtime on probe AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 12:21 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: wdma: Add compatibles for more SoCs AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 12:19 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 11:49 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] drm/mediatek: Add Write DMA (WDMA) Engine for Writeback support AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-15 12:28 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715120219.B11FD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox