Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kyrie Wu" <kyrie.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 12/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: add jpeg smmu sid setting
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720141905.8DC1B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720133432.1042046-13-kyrie.wu@mediatek.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Critical] Probe failure in SMMU initialization leaves dangling pointers in the global master device arrays and permanently increments hw_index, causing UAF and array OOB on deferred probes.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Blind dereference of HW arrays when child probes fail early.
--

--- Patch [12]: [PATCH v16 12/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: add jpeg smmu sid setting ---
commit 73b8529184733966196568926fff60cf629320ae
Author: Kyrie Wu <kyrie.wu@mediatek.com>

    media: mediatek: jpeg: add jpeg smmu sid setting
    
    Add a configuration to set jpeg dec & enc smmu sid

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> index 8e96501a4f9fa..bb9bdd9913d94 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1663,6 +1680,11 @@ static void mtk_jpegenc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>  	jpeg_dst_buf->frame_num = ctx->total_frame_num;
>  	ctx->total_frame_num++;
>  	mtk_jpeg_enc_reset(comp_jpeg[hw_id]->reg_base);
> +
> +	if (jpeg->variant->support_smmu && comp_jpeg[hw_id]->smmu_regmap)
> +		mtk_jpeg_set_smmu_sid(comp_jpeg[hw_id]->smmu_regmap,
> +				      JPG_REG_GUSER_ID_ENC_SID);
> +

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I have a question about how
unpopulated hardware array entries are handled when a child probe fails.

In mtk_jpegenc_worker(), it calls mtk_jpegenc_get_hw() to select the hw_id.
If an earlier probe failure left the array entry in enc_hw_dev as NULL, could
this result in a NULL pointer dereference?

mtk_jpegenc_get_hw() iterates based on max_hw_count (which is set from the
Device Tree child nodes) and accesses the state directly:

drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c:mtk_jpegenc_get_hw() {
    ...
    for (i = 0; i < jpeg->max_hw_count; i++) {
        comp_jpeg = jpeg->enc_hw_dev[i];
        if (comp_jpeg->hw_state == MTK_JPEG_HW_IDLE) {
    ...
}

Could this blindly dereference comp_jpeg if the child probe never completed
and left it NULL? The exact same pattern seems to exist in mtk_jpegdec_get_hw().

>  	mtk_jpeg_set_enc_dst(ctx,
>  			     comp_jpeg[hw_id]->reg_base,
>  			     &dst_buf->vb2_buf);
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_dec_hw.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_dec_hw.c
> index 07452249bcb67..3058fdf4f6054 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_dec_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_dec_hw.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -665,6 +684,10 @@ static int mtk_jpegdec_hw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	master_dev->reg_decbase[i] = dev->reg_base;
>  	dev->master_dev = master_dev;
>  
> +	ret = mtk_jpegdec_smmu_init(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +

[Severity: Critical]
If mtk_jpegdec_smmu_init() fails and returns an error like -EPROBE_DEFER,
will this leave a dangling pointer in the master_dev->dec_hw_dev array?

Looking earlier in mtk_jpegdec_hw_probe(), dev is allocated with devm_kzalloc
and added to the master_dev array, and hw_index is incremented:

    i = atomic_add_return(1, &master_dev->hw_index) - 1;
    master_dev->dec_hw_dev[i] = dev;
    master_dev->reg_decbase[i] = dev->reg_base;
    dev->master_dev = master_dev;

    ret = mtk_jpegdec_smmu_init(dev);
    if (ret)
        return ret;

When returning ret, the devm-managed dev will be freed, but the pointer
remains in master_dev->dec_hw_dev[i] and hw_index is never decremented.
Could this lead to an out-of-bounds write on deferred probe retries and a
use-after-free when the worker thread accesses the array?

This same issue seems to be present in mtk_jpegenc_hw_probe() in
mtk_jpeg_enc_hw.c as well.

>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720133432.1042046-1-kyrie.wu@mediatek.com?part=12

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 13:34 [PATCH v16 00/12] Enable jpeg enc & dec multi-hardwares for MT8196 Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 01/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: fix jpeg cores' amounts setting Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 13:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 02/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: fix jpeg buffer payload size setting Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 13:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 03/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: fix buffer structure size and layout Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 13:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 04/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: Fix buffer completion on multi-core streaming stop Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 05/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: Fix multi-core clk suspend and resume setting Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 13:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 06/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: fix buffer state update timing Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 07/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: fix resolution change event handling in decoder Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 08/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: fix remove buffer removal timing for multi-core Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 09/12] media: dt-bindings: mediatek,jpeg: Add mediatek, mt8196-jpgdec compatible Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 10/12] media: dt-bindings: mediatek,jpeg: Add mediatek, mt8196-jpgenc compatible Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 11/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: add jpeg compatible Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 13:34 ` [PATCH v16 12/12] media: mediatek: jpeg: add jpeg smmu sid setting Kyrie Wu
2026-07-20 14:19   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720141905.8DC1B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kyrie.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox