From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chris Morgan" <macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V19 6/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:01:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722160130.DEC2D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722153942.144387-7-macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Sensor data read immediately after power-on fails with -EINVAL for low ODRs due to insufficient wait time.
- [Medium] A race condition during device removal leaves the hardware permanently powered on because devm-based IIO unregistration occurs after the driver's custom remove callback.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH V19 6/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607 ---
commit d5a95e354010c482038057c3ba35322667609d59
Author: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer for icm42607
Add icm42607 accelerometer sensor for icm42607.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_accel.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_accel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f563c77084201
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_accel.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -288,21 +288,21 @@ struct iio_dev *inv_icm42607_accel_init(struct inv_icm42607_state *st)
> + indio_dev->name = name;
> + indio_dev->info = &inv_icm42607_accel_info;
> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> + indio_dev->channels = inv_icm42607_accel_channels;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(inv_icm42607_accel_channels);
> + iio_device_set_drvdata(indio_dev, st);
> +
> + ret = devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
[Severity: Medium]
Could this lead to the hardware being left permanently powered on
during device removal?
During driver unbind, the custom remove callback (inv_icm42607_sensors_off)
will run before the devm cleanup unregisters this IIO device.
If a concurrent userspace sysfs read re-enables the sensor via runtime PM
before the devm IIO unregistration occurs:
sysfs read
pm_runtime_get... (powers device on)
inv_icm42607_read_sensor()
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend... (queues async suspend)
Will the subsequent devm cleanup of runtime PM cancel the async suspend
and leave the device powered on indefinitely?
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + return indio_dev;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
> index d85eaedef0706..c1648f5c35389 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -355,18 +364,18 @@ int inv_icm42607_read_sensor(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + /* read sensor register data */
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(st->map, reg, &data, sizeof(data));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *val = be16_to_cpu(data);
> + if (*val == INV_ICM42607_DATA_INVALID)
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: Medium]
Can this return -EINVAL during normal sysfs reads at low ODRs?
When the device is in autosuspend and a sysfs read occurs at a low ODR
(e.g., 1.5625 Hz), the driver wakes up the sensor and waits for
INV_ICM42607_ACCEL_STARTUP_TIME_US (10ms).
Since the first sample at such a low ODR can take much longer (e.g., ~640ms)
to be ready, will the hardware return INV_ICM42607_DATA_INVALID here,
causing the read to fail rather than blocking until data is ready?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260722153942.144387-1-macroalpha82@gmail.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 15:39 [PATCH V19 0/9] Add Invensense ICM42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 1/9] dt-bindings: iio: imu: icm42600: Add mount-matrix Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 2/9] dt-bindings: iio: imu: icm42600: Add icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 3/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add inv_icm42607 Core Driver Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 4/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add SPI For icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 5/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add PM support for icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 16:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 6/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Accelerometer " Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 16:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 7/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Gyroscope to icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 8/9] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add Temp Support in icm42607 Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:39 ` [PATCH V19 9/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add icm42607p IMU for RG-DS Chris Morgan
2026-07-22 15:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722160130.DEC2D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macroalpha82@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox