From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:36:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723-tinkling-apple-9cdac4921218@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723135115.2AF451F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3759 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 01:50:59PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] The schema retains `additionalProperties: false` at the root level while introducing a conditional `$ref` to `spi-peripheral-props.yaml` in the `allOf` block. This breaks schema validation for standard SPI properties.
> - [Low] The newly added SPI device tree example uses an inappropriate SPI chip select value (`0x60`), copied from the I2C device address example.
> --
>
> --- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI ---
> commit a357ffde05c7807cd64bca71103d780d8dde416b
> Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
>
> dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI
>
> This commit adds SPI support for the MCP48FxBy1/2/4/8 DAC families to the
> existing MCP47FEB02 device tree binding. It introduces the new compatible
> strings, the spi-max-frequency property, and a devicetree example for SPI.
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml
> > index d131f136bd151..d25c763241a4f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml
> > @@ -178,6 +239,13 @@ required:
> > - vdd-supply
> >
> > allOf:
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + pattern: "^microchip,mcp48f[ev]b[0-2][1248]$"
> > + then:
> > + $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + spi-max-frequency: false
> > +
> > additionalProperties: false
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Since this schema now includes a conditional $ref to spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> in the allOf block, should this be changed to unevaluatedProperties: false?
>
> JSON Schema limits additionalProperties: false to only evaluating properties
> explicitly declared in the root properties or patternProperties. Any standard
> SPI properties pulled in via the conditional $ref will be incorrectly rejected
> by dt_binding_check.
This trips up Sashiko a lot.
This additionalProperties is fine if spi-max-frequency is the only
property from that binding that this device uses.
>
> > examples:
> > @@ -299,4 +424,29 @@ examples:
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > + - |
> > + spi {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + dac@60 {
> > + compatible = "microchip,mcp48feb02";
> > + reg = <0x60>;
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Is 0x60 intended to be used as an SPI chip select here, or was this copied
> from the I2C example?
>
> Typically, an SPI chip select would be 0 or 1, and the node would be named
> dac@0 with reg = <0>.
It's an example, so it doesn't matter. But yes, looks like a copy-paste
mistake.
>
> > + vdd-supply = <&vdac_vdd>;
> > + vref-supply = <&vref_reg>;
> > + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + channel@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + label = "Adjustable_voltage_ch0";
> > + };
> > +
> > + channel@1 {
> > + reg = <0x1>;
> > + label = "Adjustable_voltage_ch1";
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > ...
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-mcp47feb02_refactor-v1-0-ee59e63672bc@microchip.com?part=2
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 21:18 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-07-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 13:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 16:36 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-07-23 16:38 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 21:02 ` Joshua Crofts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723-tinkling-apple-9cdac4921218@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox