From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:50:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723135115.2AF451F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-mcp47feb02_refactor-v1-2-ee59e63672bc@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The schema retains `additionalProperties: false` at the root level while introducing a conditional `$ref` to `spi-peripheral-props.yaml` in the `allOf` block. This breaks schema validation for standard SPI properties.
- [Low] The newly added SPI device tree example uses an inappropriate SPI chip select value (`0x60`), copied from the I2C device address example.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI ---
commit a357ffde05c7807cd64bca71103d780d8dde416b
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI
This commit adds SPI support for the MCP48FxBy1/2/4/8 DAC families to the
existing MCP47FEB02 device tree binding. It introduces the new compatible
strings, the spi-max-frequency property, and a devicetree example for SPI.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml
> index d131f136bd151..d25c763241a4f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp47feb02.yaml
> @@ -178,6 +239,13 @@ required:
> - vdd-supply
>
> allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + pattern: "^microchip,mcp48f[ev]b[0-2][1248]$"
> + then:
> + $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
[ ... ]
> + then:
> + properties:
> + spi-max-frequency: false
> +
> additionalProperties: false
[Severity: Medium]
Since this schema now includes a conditional $ref to spi-peripheral-props.yaml
in the allOf block, should this be changed to unevaluatedProperties: false?
JSON Schema limits additionalProperties: false to only evaluating properties
explicitly declared in the root properties or patternProperties. Any standard
SPI properties pulled in via the conditional $ref will be incorrectly rejected
by dt_binding_check.
> examples:
> @@ -299,4 +424,29 @@ examples:
> };
> };
> };
> + - |
> + spi {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + dac@60 {
> + compatible = "microchip,mcp48feb02";
> + reg = <0x60>;
[Severity: Low]
Is 0x60 intended to be used as an SPI chip select here, or was this copied
from the I2C example?
Typically, an SPI chip select would be 0 or 1, and the node would be named
dac@0 with reg = <0>.
> + vdd-supply = <&vdac_vdd>;
> + vref-supply = <&vref_reg>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
> +
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + channel@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + label = "Adjustable_voltage_ch0";
> + };
> +
> + channel@1 {
> + reg = <0x1>;
> + label = "Adjustable_voltage_ch1";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> ...
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-mcp47feb02_refactor-v1-0-ee59e63672bc@microchip.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 21:18 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-07-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 13:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-23 16:36 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-23 16:38 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-07-23 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 21:02 ` Joshua Crofts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723135115.2AF451F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox