Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Imran Shaik" <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: qcom: common: Register reset controller only when resets are present
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:55:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723155515.68A0E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-shikra-audiocorecc-v3-1-90b878ae0d4e@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The local pointer `reset` is used uninitialized when registering GDSCs if the clock controller defines GDSCs but no resets.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: qcom: common: Register reset controller only when resets are present ---
commit 4dacf2df1c1e317705833daaa92c7514eab60f24
Author: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>

clk: qcom: common: Register reset controller only when resets are present

This commit avoids registering a reset controller if the clock controller
descriptor does not define any resets. It does this by checking if
desc->num_resets is non-zero before initializing and registering the
controller.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -359,17 +359,19 @@ int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
>  		qcom_cc_clk_regs_configure(dev, desc->driver_data, regmap);
>  	}
>  
> -	reset = &cc->reset;
> -	reset->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> -	reset->rcdev.ops = &qcom_reset_ops;
> -	reset->rcdev.owner = dev->driver->owner;
> -	reset->rcdev.nr_resets = desc->num_resets;
> -	reset->regmap = regmap;
> -	reset->reset_map = desc->resets;
> -
> -	ret = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &reset->rcdev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto put_rpm;
> +	if (desc->num_resets) {
> +		reset = &cc->reset;
> +		reset->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> +		reset->rcdev.ops = &qcom_reset_ops;
> +		reset->rcdev.owner = dev->driver->owner;
> +		reset->rcdev.nr_resets = desc->num_resets;
> +		reset->regmap = regmap;
> +		reset->reset_map = desc->resets;
> +
> +		ret = devm_reset_controller_register(dev, &reset->rcdev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto put_rpm;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (desc->gdscs && desc->num_gdscs) {
>  		scd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scd), GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!scd) {
>  			ret = -ENOMEM;
>  			goto put_rpm;
>  		}
>  		scd->dev = dev;
>  		scd->scs = desc->gdscs;
>  		scd->num = desc->num_gdscs;
>  		scd->pd_list = cc->pd_list;
>  		ret = gdsc_register(scd, &reset->rcdev, regmap);

[Severity: High]
If a clock controller defines GDSCs but no resets, does this leave the reset
pointer uninitialized when evaluated here?

During qcom_cc_really_probe(), the new if (desc->num_resets) block skips the
initialization of the reset pointer when the clock controller has no resets
defined. 

However, the pointer arithmetic &reset->rcdev is still evaluated when
calling gdsc_register(). Passing this uninitialized garbage address could invoke
undefined behavior and cause a panic during boot when compiler hardening tools
are enabled.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-shikra-audiocorecc-v3-0-90b878ae0d4e@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23 15:45 [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: qcom: Add Audio Core clock controller support on Qualcomm Shikra SoC Imran Shaik
2026-07-23 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: qcom: common: Register reset controller only when resets are present Imran Shaik
2026-07-23 15:55   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-23 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add Qualcomm Shikra AudioCoreCC and AudioCoreCSR Imran Shaik
2026-07-23 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: qcom: Add Audio Core clock controller support on Qualcomm Shikra SoC Imran Shaik
2026-07-23 16:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: shikra: Add support for AudioCoreCC and AudioCoreCSR nodes Imran Shaik
2026-07-23 16:25   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260723155515.68A0E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox