Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu-Chun Lin" <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/11] clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:40:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728144016.B1F7B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728142806.1954638-9-eleanor.lin@realtek.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] CCF API contract violation: determine_rate calculates dynamic rates while set_rate hardcodes fixed PLL settings.
- [Medium] Intermediate integer overflow in 32-bit clock rate calculation within determine_rate.
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v11 08/11] clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks ---
commit d6c866691778847bec596fd7ef12315587301b82
Author: Cheng-Yu Lee <cylee12@realtek.com>

clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks

This commit adds clk_pll_mmc_ops for enable/disable, prepare, rate control,
and status operations on MMC PLL clocks. It also adds clk_pll_mmc_phase_ops
to support phase get/set operations.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-pll-mmc.c b/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-pll-mmc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..8da1933a5a079
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-pll-mmc.c
[ ... ]
> +static int rtk_clk_regmap_pll_mmc_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (!req->best_parent_rate)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)req->rate * 4, req->best_parent_rate);
> +	val = clamp_t(u32, val, RTK_PLL_MMC_VAL_MIN, RTK_PLL_MMC_VAL_MAX);
> +	req->rate = req->best_parent_rate * val / 4;

[Severity: Medium]
Could this calculation overflow on 32-bit platforms where unsigned long is
32 bits?

With a parent rate of 27MHz and val of 255, the intermediate result of
req->best_parent_rate * val is ~6.88 billion. This exceeds U32_MAX and
truncates to ~2.59 billion before dividing by 4, returning an incorrect
target rate to the caller.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rtk_clk_regmap_pll_mmc_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +					   unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct rtk_clk_regmap_pll_mmc *clkm = to_clk_pll_mmc(hw);
> +	u32 val = RTK_PLL_MMC_SSC_DIV_N_VAL;

[Severity: High]
Does this violate the Common Clock Framework API contract by hardcoding a fixed
multiplier here, while allowing dynamic rate calculations in
rtk_clk_regmap_pll_mmc_determine_rate()?

Because rtk_clk_regmap_pll_mmc_determine_rate() calculates requested
rates dynamically, it signals to callers that arbitrary target rates can be
achieved. However, this function ignores the requested rate and unconditionally
applies a static multiplier to the hardware.

Downstream consumers relying on clk_round_rate() or clk_set_rate() returning
the truth might miscalculate their internal dividers, as they would assume the
dynamically requested rate was successfully applied rather than the fixed rate.
 
[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728142806.1954638-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28 14:27 [PATCH v11 00/11] clk / reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 clock and reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:27 ` [PATCH v11 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Realtek RTD1625 Clock & Reset Controller Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:27 ` [PATCH v11 02/11] reset: Add Realtek basic reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:27 ` [PATCH v11 03/11] reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 reset controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 14:27 ` [PATCH v11 04/11] clk: realtek: Introduce a common probe() Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 05/11] clk: realtek: Add support for phase locked loops (PLLs) Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 06/11] clk: realtek: Add support for gate clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 07/11] clk: realtek: Add support for mux clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 08/11] clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 09/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-CRT clock controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-ISO " Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-28 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 11/11] arm64: dts: realtek: Add clock support for RTD1625 Yu-Chun Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260728144016.B1F7B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eleanor.lin@realtek.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox