From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Cosmo Chou" <chou.cosmo@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Add second source ISL1208 RTC
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:51:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729115102.B7BA41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729114312.3947300-5-chou.cosmo@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Adding the ISL1208 as an active alternative RTC introduces a system-level regression on boards populated with the ISL1208. The unpopulated primary PCF85263 will register a phantom /dev/rtc0 device due to a missing I2C failure check in its driver, causing the ISL1208 to be registered as /dev/rtc1 and breaking userspace time synchronization.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Add second source ISL1208 RTC ---
commit 02d65705396424e85939c4fb70bef75dc330e54c
Author: Cosmo Chou <chou.cosmo@gmail.com>
ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Add second source ISL1208 RTC
This commit adds an alternative ISL1208 RTC node at address 0x6f to support
boards populated with the ISL1208 instead of the primary PCF85263.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts
> index 3da1cf9bbb990..01dbbda3e4b6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley.dts
> @@ -1269,6 +1269,11 @@ eeprom@56 {
> compatible = "atmel,24c64";
> reg = <0x56>;
> };
> +
> + rtc@6f {
> + compatible = "isil,isl1208";
> + reg = <0x6f>;
> + };
[Severity: High]
Will adding this alternative RTC node break userspace time synchronization on
boards populated with the ISL1208?
Looking at the primary RTC's driver probe function:
drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c:pcf85363_probe() {
...
err = pcf85363_load_capacitance(pcf85363, client->dev.of_node);
if (err < 0)
dev_warn(&client->dev, "failed to set xtal load capacitance: %d",
err);
pcf85363->rtc->ops = &rtc_ops;
...
}
The PCF85263 driver ignores I2C communication errors during probe. If a board
is populated with the ISL1208 instead of the PCF85263, the absent PCF85263
will still successfully probe and register a phantom /dev/rtc0 device.
Does this cause the ISL1208 to be registered as /dev/rtc1, resulting in
userspace services like hwclock or systemd-timesyncd targeting the
non-functional phantom device by default?
Should this alternative topology be handled via a bootloader fixup, or
should the rtc-pcf85363 driver be fixed to fail probe when the hardware
is absent before adding this node?
> };
>
> &i2c7 {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729114312.3947300-1-chou.cosmo@gmail.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 11:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Cleanups and second source devices Cosmo Chou
2026-07-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Sort i2c device nodes by address Cosmo Chou
2026-07-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Fix style warnings Cosmo Chou
2026-07-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Add second source PCA9532 LED controllers Cosmo Chou
2026-07-29 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: bletchley: Add second source ISL1208 RTC Cosmo Chou
2026-07-29 11:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729115102.B7BA41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chou.cosmo@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox