Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Louis-Alexis Eyraud" <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	robh@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:30:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730103044.9A6B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-mt8196-ufs-v10-12-bc5ecef202dc@collabora.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Dangling pointer to `phy_dev` in `ufs_mtk_probe()` due to premature `put_device()`.
--

--- Patch [12]: [PATCH v10 12/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft ---
commit 6a21968869510eaa0eea1b9f7b65e382357ae809
Author: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>

scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft

Both ufs_mtk_vreg_fix_vcc and ufs_mtk_vreg_fix_vccqx look like they are
vendor kernel hacks to work around existing downstream device trees.
Mainline does not need or want them, so remove them.

> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> index a2749e79514c4..e5527969a5e67 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does dropping the kobject
reference to phy_dev with put_device() leave host->phy_dev as a dangling
pointer?

drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:ufs_mtk_probe() {
	...
		pm_runtime_set_active(phy_dev);
		pm_runtime_enable(phy_dev);
		pm_runtime_get_sync(phy_dev);

		put_device(phy_dev);
		dev_info(dev, "phys node found\n");
	...
	if (phy_node && phy_dev) {
		host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
		host->phy_dev = phy_dev;
	}
	...
}

If the PHY platform device is unregistered (for example, via DT overlay removal
or manual sysfs unbind) between the UFS probe and runtime PM transitions,
would dereferencing this pointer later in ufs_mtk_runtime_suspend() or
ufs_mtk_runtime_resume() cause a use-after-free?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-mt8196-ufs-v10-0-bc5ecef202dc@collabora.com?part=12

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  9:48 [PATCH v10 00/26] MediaTek UFS Cleanup and MT8196 Enablement Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:48 ` [PATCH v10 01/26] dt-bindings: phy: Add mediatek,mt8196-ufsphy variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:48 ` [PATCH v10 02/26] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Complete the binding Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:48 ` [PATCH v10 03/26] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Add mt8196 variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 04/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Move MTK_SIP_UFS_CONTROL to mtk_sip_svc.h Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 05/26] phy: mediatek: ufs: Add support for resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 06/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 07/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework 0.9V regulator Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 08/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework init function Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 09/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework the crypt-boost stuff Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 10/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Handle misc host voltage regulators Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 11/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented downstream reset cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 12/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:30   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 13/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Use the common PHY framework Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 14/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove mediatek,ufs-broken-rtc property Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 15/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework _ufs_mtk_clk_scale error paths Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 16/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Clean up logging prints Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 17/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework ufs_mtk_wait_idle_state Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 18/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Don't acquire dvfsrc-vcore twice Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 19/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework hardware version reading Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 20/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Back up idle timer in per-instance struct Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 21/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove ret local from link_startup_notify Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 22/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min" Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 23/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Add MT8196 compatible, update copyright Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 24/26] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Align ufshci node to dt-bindings changes Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 11:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 25/26] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8395-genio-1200-evk-ufs: Complete UFS power supplies Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30  9:49 ` [PATCH v10 26/26] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8395-radxa-nio-12l: " Louis-Alexis Eyraud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730103044.9A6B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox