From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Louis-Alexis Eyraud" <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 22/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:49:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730104938.833311F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-mt8196-ufs-v10-22-bc5ecef202dc@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Incomplete feature removal leaves behind unused struct field and dead code for UFS clock vcore scaling.
--
--- Patch [22]: [PATCH v10 22/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min" ---
commit 35c917bdf36a893b4dd563ccc122d8d25ec6d9ed
Author: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
This commit removes support for the undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
property from the MediaTek UFS driver. It deletes the device tree parsing
logic and the initial vcore regulator setup.
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> index 90c8606d85a9d..5dd72b8261815 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -918,24 +916,7 @@ static void ufs_mtk_init_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> if (!ufs_mtk_is_clk_scale_ready(hba)) {
> hba->caps &= ~UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING;
> dev_info(hba->dev, "%s: Clock scaling unavailable", __func__);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (!host->reg_vcore)
> - return;
> -
> - if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clk-scale-up-vcore-min",
> - &volt)) {
> - dev_info(dev, "failed to get clk-scale-up-vcore-min");
> - return;
> }
> -
> - host->mclk.vcore_volt = volt;
[Severity: Low]
Since this patch removes the code that populates host->mclk.vcore_volt, does
it leave behind an unused field and dead code elsewhere in the driver?
In drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.h:
struct ufs_mtk_clk {
...
int vcore_volt;
...
};
And in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:_ufs_mtk_clk_scale():
volt = host->mclk.vcore_volt;
if (host->reg_vcore && volt)
clk_bind_vcore = true;
Because vcore_volt is zero-initialized and no longer updated, clk_bind_vcore
appears to always be false, which makes the subsequent regulator scaling
branches permanently unreachable. Should these leftovers be cleaned up as
well?
> -
> - /* If default boot is max gear, request vcore */
> - if (volt && host->clk_scale_up)
> - if (regulator_set_voltage(host->reg_vcore, volt, INT_MAX))
> - dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to set vcore to %d\n", volt);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-mt8196-ufs-v10-0-bc5ecef202dc@collabora.com?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 9:48 [PATCH v10 00/26] MediaTek UFS Cleanup and MT8196 Enablement Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:48 ` [PATCH v10 01/26] dt-bindings: phy: Add mediatek,mt8196-ufsphy variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:48 ` [PATCH v10 02/26] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Complete the binding Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:48 ` [PATCH v10 03/26] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Add mt8196 variant Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 04/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Move MTK_SIP_UFS_CONTROL to mtk_sip_svc.h Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 05/26] phy: mediatek: ufs: Add support for resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 06/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework resets Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 07/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework 0.9V regulator Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 08/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework init function Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 09/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework the crypt-boost stuff Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 10/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Handle misc host voltage regulators Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 11/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented downstream reset cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 12/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 13/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Use the common PHY framework Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 14/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove mediatek,ufs-broken-rtc property Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 15/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework _ufs_mtk_clk_scale error paths Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 16/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Clean up logging prints Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 17/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework ufs_mtk_wait_idle_state Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 18/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Don't acquire dvfsrc-vcore twice Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 19/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework hardware version reading Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 20/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Back up idle timer in per-instance struct Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 21/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove ret local from link_startup_notify Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 22/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented "clk-scale-up-vcore-min" Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 10:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 23/26] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Add MT8196 compatible, update copyright Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 24/26] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Align ufshci node to dt-bindings changes Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 11:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 25/26] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8395-genio-1200-evk-ufs: Complete UFS power supplies Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-30 9:49 ` [PATCH v10 26/26] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8395-radxa-nio-12l: " Louis-Alexis Eyraud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730104938.833311F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox