From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 09:06:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802090622.399B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802-n-dts-style-checker-continued-v2-8-6c5dbd1ccfe4@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The selftest runner `scripts/dtc/dt-style-selftest/run.sh` was not updated to test `good/` fixtures against the newly added `stricter` mode.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v2 08/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode ---
commit 9aebf208f76b608e7a3091f58903f2279782a0e4
Author: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode
Two rules, which are enabled in 'strict' mode make little sense for DTS:
1. line-length, limiting length of line to 80 characters: DTS often has
a bit longer lines, especially for interconnects or heavily nested
opp-level. Checkpatch already does not warn for exceeding 80
characters.
2. unused-labels, discouraging unused labels in DTS or YAML (not DTSI or
DTSO): while not harming this leads to many false positives, e.g.
unused PMIC regulators in DTS.
Introduce another 'mode' of running beside existing relaxed and strict:
a 'stricter' one where these two rules are moved for DTS. Intention is
to have in-tree DTS passing 'strict' mode.
> diff --git a/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style b/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> index 54e96ce04b209..56d8d0c217f20 100755
> --- a/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> +++ b/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> @@ -5,12 +5,14 @@
> # .dts/.dtsi/.dtso source files. Enforces rules from
> # Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst.
> #
> -# Two modes:
> +# Three modes:
> # --mode=relaxed (default)
> # Only rules that produce zero warnings on the current tree.
> # Suitable for dt_binding_check.
> # --mode=strict
> -# All rules. Required for new submissions.
> +# Most of the rules. Required for new submissions.
> +# --mode=stricter
> +# All rules, including ones having false positives.
[Severity: Medium]
Should the selftest runner be updated to cover this newly added mode?
Looking at scripts/dtc/dt-style-selftest/run.sh, the loop for testing good
fixtures still only iterates over relaxed and strict modes:
scripts/dtc/dt-style-selftest/run.sh:
# good/ -- must exit 0 and produce no output in both modes
for f in "$here"/good/*; do
[ -e "$f" ] || continue
for mode in relaxed strict; do
out=$(run "$f" "$mode")
This leaves the newly added stricter mode untested against valid fixtures,
and leaves the script comment referring to "both modes" out of date.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802-n-dts-style-checker-continued-v2-0-6c5dbd1ccfe4@oss.qualcomm.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 8:45 [PATCH v2 00/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Improvements for false positives Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Add missing /dts-v1/ to few test cases Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Simplify setting depth of DtsLine Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Handle root node in overlays Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 9:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Handle sorting of top-level nodes and properties Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Drop stray backslash before quote for continuation-alignment Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Fix alignment of values in continued property lines Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Consistently call 'kind' as 'file_type' Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 9:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-02 10:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Add test for trailing white-space in DTS Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Add warning for redundant white-spaces Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] MAINTAINERS: dt-bindings: Include dt-check-style in DT binding entry Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802090622.399B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox