Re: [PATCH v8 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] spi_mem_default_supports_op() incorrectly rejects standard operations if post_config_max_speed_hz equals max_speed_hz on controllers lacking the per_op_freq capability.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v8 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops ---
commit 66e4cfc36fb55feef18471a08846b1db198c893f
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>

spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops

This commit introduces a bypass in spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() for post-config
operations matching post_config_max_speed_hz. It also updates
spi_mem_default_supports_op() to require the per_op_freq controller
capability for these operations.

> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> index 5f973ebfb8b6e..cd4bc4c914e7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ bool spi_mem_default_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (op->max_freq &&
> -	    op->max_freq < mem->spi->max_speed_hz) {
> +	    (op->max_freq < mem->spi->max_speed_hz ||
> +	     op->max_freq == mem->spi->post_config_max_speed_hz)) {
>  		if (!spi_mem_controller_is_capable(ctlr, per_op_freq))
>  			return false;
>  	}

[Severity: High]
Does this incorrectly reject standard operations if a device tree configures
the post-config frequency to be identical to the base max_speed_hz on
controllers lacking the per_op_freq capability?

If spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() sets op->max_freq to mem->spi->max_speed_hz
for standard operations, and post_config_max_speed_hz happens to equal
max_speed_hz, this condition will evaluate to true.

Could this unnecessarily require the per_op_freq capability for all standard
operations, such as reading the flash ID during probe, and prevent the
device from working entirely in this configuration?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821114822.4040338-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=4