Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Santhosh Kumar K" <s-k6@ti.com>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:43:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821134304.886C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821114822.4040338-13-s-k6@ti.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] PHY is enabled for indirect writes without verifying the operation's actual frequency, causing PHY timing mismatch at lower frequencies.
- [High] Ignoring the return value of `cqspi_wait_idle()` on the success path leaves the PHY enabled if a timeout occurs.
--

--- Patch [12]: [PATCH v8 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes ---
commit 573d2ac8c7923def59b134920cd9dc6bde273f1c
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>

spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes

This commit enables PHY for indirect writes larger than a minimum length
to amortize PHY enable/disable overhead. It threads post_config_max_speed_hz
into the indirect write execution path and attempts to safely disable the
PHY even if the write fails.

> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1362,18 +1364,32 @@ static int cqspi_write_setup(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  
>  static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  					loff_t to_addr, const u8 *txbuf,
> -					const size_t n_tx)
> +					const size_t n_tx,
> +					u32 post_config_max_speed_hz)
>  {
>  	struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
>  	struct device *dev = &cqspi->pdev->dev;
>  	void __iomem *reg_base = cqspi->iobase;
>  	unsigned int remaining = n_tx;
>  	unsigned int write_bytes;
> +	bool use_tuned_phy_write;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!refcount_read(&cqspi->refcount))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	/* Use PHY only for large writes at the calibrated rate */
> +	use_tuned_phy_write = n_tx >= CQSPI_PHY_MIN_INDIRECT_WRITE_LEN &&
> +			      f_pdata->use_tuned_phy &&
> +			      f_pdata->phy_write_op.max_freq ==
> +				      post_config_max_speed_hz;

[Severity: High]
Will this apply high-frequency DLL calibrations to lower frequency operations?

The driver dynamically configures the clock frequency per operation via
cqspi_configure() using op->max_freq. However, this condition checks if the
calibrated maximum frequency matches the post-configuration maximum speed,
rather than checking the current operation's actual frequency.

If an indirect write executes at a lower frequency than the calibrated
maximum, wouldn't this condition still evaluate to true and corrupt data
by applying mismatched PHY timing?

> +
> +	if (use_tuned_phy_write) {
> +		ret = cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	writel(to_addr, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWRSTARTADDR);
>  	writel(remaining, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWRBYTES);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1452,15 +1468,26 @@ static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  
>  	cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi);
>  
> +	if (use_tuned_phy_write)
> +		cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false);
> +
>  	return 0;

[Severity: High]
If cqspi_wait_idle() times out here, does it leak the enabled PHY state?

The return value of cqspi_wait_idle() is ignored on this success path. If
a timeout occurs, the subsequent call to cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false)
will immediately fail its internal idle check and fail to disable the PHY.

Since this function still returns 0 (success) in that scenario, the caller
is unaware of the failure, and subsequent non-PHY operations (like polling
the status register) will execute with the PHY unexpectedly active.

Should the return value of cqspi_wait_idle() be checked, or the error
properly handled so the PHY is successfully disabled?

>  
>  failwr:
>  	/* Disable interrupt. */
>  	writel(0, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_IRQMASK);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821114822.4040338-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=12

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 11:48 [PATCH v8 00/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 01/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 02/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 03/18] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 12:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 12:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 05/18] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 06/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 07/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 08/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 12:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 09/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 10/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 11/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:43   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 13/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram CS timing on every chip-select switch Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 14/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 15/18] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best_variant() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 16/18] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 14:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 17/18] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 18/18] mtd: spi-nor: run controller optimization before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821134304.886C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-k6@ti.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox