From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Santhosh Kumar K" <s-k6@ti.com>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:43:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821134304.886C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821114822.4040338-13-s-k6@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] PHY is enabled for indirect writes without verifying the operation's actual frequency, causing PHY timing mismatch at lower frequencies.
- [High] Ignoring the return value of `cqspi_wait_idle()` on the success path leaves the PHY enabled if a timeout occurs.
--
--- Patch [12]: [PATCH v8 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes ---
commit 573d2ac8c7923def59b134920cd9dc6bde273f1c
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes
This commit enables PHY for indirect writes larger than a minimum length
to amortize PHY enable/disable overhead. It threads post_config_max_speed_hz
into the indirect write execution path and attempts to safely disable the
PHY even if the write fails.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1362,18 +1364,32 @@ static int cqspi_write_setup(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>
> static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
> loff_t to_addr, const u8 *txbuf,
> - const size_t n_tx)
> + const size_t n_tx,
> + u32 post_config_max_speed_hz)
> {
> struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
> struct device *dev = &cqspi->pdev->dev;
> void __iomem *reg_base = cqspi->iobase;
> unsigned int remaining = n_tx;
> unsigned int write_bytes;
> + bool use_tuned_phy_write;
> int ret;
>
> if (!refcount_read(&cqspi->refcount))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /* Use PHY only for large writes at the calibrated rate */
> + use_tuned_phy_write = n_tx >= CQSPI_PHY_MIN_INDIRECT_WRITE_LEN &&
> + f_pdata->use_tuned_phy &&
> + f_pdata->phy_write_op.max_freq ==
> + post_config_max_speed_hz;
[Severity: High]
Will this apply high-frequency DLL calibrations to lower frequency operations?
The driver dynamically configures the clock frequency per operation via
cqspi_configure() using op->max_freq. However, this condition checks if the
calibrated maximum frequency matches the post-configuration maximum speed,
rather than checking the current operation's actual frequency.
If an indirect write executes at a lower frequency than the calibrated
maximum, wouldn't this condition still evaluate to true and corrupt data
by applying mismatched PHY timing?
> +
> + if (use_tuned_phy_write) {
> + ret = cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> writel(to_addr, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWRSTARTADDR);
> writel(remaining, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWRBYTES);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1452,15 +1468,26 @@ static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>
> cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi);
>
> + if (use_tuned_phy_write)
> + cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false);
> +
> return 0;
[Severity: High]
If cqspi_wait_idle() times out here, does it leak the enabled PHY state?
The return value of cqspi_wait_idle() is ignored on this success path. If
a timeout occurs, the subsequent call to cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false)
will immediately fail its internal idle check and fail to disable the PHY.
Since this function still returns 0 (success) in that scenario, the caller
is unaware of the failure, and subsequent non-PHY operations (like polling
the status register) will execute with the PHY unexpectedly active.
Should the return value of cqspi_wait_idle() be checked, or the error
properly handled so the PHY is successfully disabled?
>
> failwr:
> /* Disable interrupt. */
> writel(0, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_IRQMASK);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821114822.4040338-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 11:48 [PATCH v8 00/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 01/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 02/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 03/18] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 12:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 05/18] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 06/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 07/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 08/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 12:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 09/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 10/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 11/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 13/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram CS timing on every chip-select switch Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 14/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 13:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 15/18] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best_variant() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 16/18] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 14:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 17/18] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-21 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 18/18] mtd: spi-nor: run controller optimization before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821134304.886C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox