* [PATCH v4 0/2] thermal: Add support A9
@ 2026-08-25 6:28 Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: amlogic: Add A9 thermal bindings Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay @ 2026-08-25 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guillaume La Roque, Rafael J. Wysocki, Daniel Lezcano, Zhang Rui,
Lukasz Luba, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
Cc: linux-pm, linux-amlogic, devicetree, linux-kernel, Xianwei Zhao,
Conor Dooley
Document the thermal controller compatibles for the Amlogic A9 SoC
And add driver support for the Amlogic A9 thermal controller.
Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Fix type error in comit mesage, and set factor valid value.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260821-a9-thermal-v3-0-0e7abf3941e3@amlogic.com
Changes in v3:
- Binding: add restrictive conditions for clock, and remove remove "amlogic,hw-reset-temp" property.
- Driver: add private data reset_temp instead of get value from DTS.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260811-a9-thermal-v2-0-7ddc33b11b9a@amlogic.com
Changes in v2:
- Fix the spelling mistakes (clock-names) and reset-temp properties is visible to old chips.
- Adjust the clock enable sequence in resume func and remove the clock disable in remove func.
- Add the judgment on the divisor zero.
- Add description of support for over-temperature reset for old chips in commit message.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260730-a9-thermal-v1-0-d786d37cba58@amlogic.com
---
Xianwei Zhao (2):
dt-bindings: thermal: amlogic: Add A9 thermal bindings
thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller
.../bindings/thermal/amlogic,thermal.yaml | 27 ++++-
drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 78bc8af4affb9a732504eb22eeac7d1e50883853
change-id: 20260703-a9-thermal-f62cef6ea91f
Best regards,
--
Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: amlogic: Add A9 thermal bindings
2026-08-25 6:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] thermal: Add support A9 Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
@ 2026-08-25 6:28 ` Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay @ 2026-08-25 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guillaume La Roque, Rafael J. Wysocki, Daniel Lezcano, Zhang Rui,
Lukasz Luba, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
Cc: linux-pm, linux-amlogic, devicetree, linux-kernel, Xianwei Zhao,
Conor Dooley
From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
Document the thermal controller compatibles for the Amlogic A9 SoC.
Describe the required "core" and "pclk" clocks, and update the schema
constraints for A9-specific thermal controllers.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
---
.../bindings/thermal/amlogic,thermal.yaml | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/amlogic,thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/amlogic,thermal.yaml
index 8cfa44dcda58..1b02404d67d5 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/amlogic,thermal.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/amlogic,thermal.yaml
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
- const: amlogic,g12a-thermal
- enum:
- amlogic,a1-cpu-thermal
+ - amlogic,a9-thermal
- amlogic,t7-thermal
reg:
@@ -32,7 +33,13 @@ properties:
maxItems: 1
clocks:
- maxItems: 1
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2
+
+ clock-names:
+ items:
+ - const: core
+ - const: pclk
power-domains:
maxItems: 1
@@ -73,6 +80,24 @@ allOf:
required:
- amlogic,secure-monitor
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - amlogic,a9-thermal
+ then:
+ properties:
+ clocks:
+ minItems: 2
+ required:
+ - clock-names
+ else:
+ properties:
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+ clock-names: false
+
unevaluatedProperties: false
examples:
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller
2026-08-25 6:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] thermal: Add support A9 Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: amlogic: Add A9 thermal bindings Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
@ 2026-08-25 6:28 ` Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay @ 2026-08-25 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guillaume La Roque, Rafael J. Wysocki, Daniel Lezcano, Zhang Rui,
Lukasz Luba, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
Cc: linux-pm, linux-amlogic, devicetree, linux-kernel, Xianwei Zhao
From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
Add support for the Amlogic A9 thermal controller.
The A9 thermal controller uses different calibration parameters, requires
separate core and bus clocks, and supports a hardware over-temperature
reset mechanism, and restore the hardware reset configuration after resume.
Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
---
drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c
index a0b530624b60..74f0bc49c737 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c
@@ -45,6 +45,18 @@
TSENSOR_CFG_REG1_DEM_EN | \
TSENSOR_CFG_REG1_CH_SEL)
+#define TSENSOR_CFG_REG2 0x8
+ #define TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_HITEMP_EN BIT(31)
+ #define TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_EN BIT(30)
+ #define TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_CODE GENMASK(15, 4)
+ #define TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_TIME GENMASK(23, 16)
+ #define TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_ENABLE \
+ (TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_HITEMP_EN | \
+ TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_EN | \
+ TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_TIME)
+
+#define TSENSOR_TEMP_CAL 1
+
#define TSENSOR_STAT0 0x40
#define TSENSOR_STAT9 0x64
@@ -63,6 +75,7 @@
#define TSENSOR_CALIB_OFFSET 1
#define TSENSOR_CALIB_SHIFT 4
+#define TSENSOR_HW_RESET_DEFAULT_TEMP 110000
/**
* struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data
@@ -85,14 +98,18 @@ struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data {
* @u_efuse_off: register offset to read fused calibration value
* @calibration_parameters: calibration parameters structure pointer
* @regmap_config: regmap config for the device
+ * @reset_temp: the hardware-controlled reset temperature value
* @use_sm: read data from secure monitor instead of efuse
+ * @has_sysclk: sensor driver control sysclk
* This structure is required for configuration of amlogic thermal driver.
*/
struct amlogic_thermal_data {
int u_efuse_off;
const struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data *calibration_parameters;
const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
+ u32 reset_temp;
bool use_sm;
+ bool has_sysclk;
};
struct amlogic_thermal {
@@ -101,8 +118,10 @@ struct amlogic_thermal {
struct regmap *regmap;
struct regmap *sec_ao_map;
struct clk *clk;
+ struct clk *sysclk;
struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
u32 trim_info;
+ u32 temp_code;
struct meson_sm_firmware *sm_fw;
u32 tsensor_id;
};
@@ -138,6 +157,49 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_code_to_millicelsius(struct amlogic_thermal *pdata,
return temp;
}
+/*
+ * Calculate a temperature code from a temperature value .
+ * The unit of the temperature is degree milliCelsius.
+ */
+static u32 amlogic_thermal_millicelsius_to_code(struct amlogic_thermal *pdata, int millicelsius)
+{
+ const struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data *param =
+ pdata->data->calibration_parameters;
+ s64 factor, uptat, uefuse;
+ u32 temp_code;
+
+ uefuse = pdata->trim_info & TSENSOR_TRIM_SIGN_MASK ?
+ ~(pdata->trim_info & TSENSOR_TRIM_TEMP_MASK) + 1 :
+ (pdata->trim_info & TSENSOR_TRIM_TEMP_MASK);
+
+ factor = param->B + div_s64(millicelsius, 100);
+ factor = BIT(16) * factor;
+ factor = div_s64(factor, param->A);
+ factor = factor - uefuse;
+
+ uptat = param->n * factor;
+ uptat = div_s64(uptat, BIT(16));
+ uptat = param->m - uptat;
+
+ factor = factor * 100;
+ if (!uptat)
+ factor = (TSENSOR_TEMP_MASK - TSENSOR_TEMP_CAL) << 0x4;
+ else
+ factor = div_s64(factor, uptat);
+
+ temp_code = ((factor >> 0x4) & TSENSOR_TEMP_MASK) + TSENSOR_TEMP_CAL;
+
+ return temp_code;
+}
+
+static void amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset(struct amlogic_thermal *data)
+{
+ regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_CODE,
+ data->temp_code << 0x4);
+ regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2,
+ TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_ENABLE, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_ENABLE);
+}
+
static int amlogic_thermal_enable(struct amlogic_thermal *data)
{
int ret;
@@ -254,6 +316,13 @@ static const struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data amlogic_thermal_g12a = {
.n = 324,
};
+static const struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data amlogic_thermal_a9 = {
+ .A = 9164,
+ .B = 2747,
+ .m = 370,
+ .n = 270,
+};
+
static const struct amlogic_thermal_data amlogic_thermal_g12a_cpu_param = {
.u_efuse_off = 0x128,
.calibration_parameters = &amlogic_thermal_g12a,
@@ -272,6 +341,14 @@ static const struct amlogic_thermal_data amlogic_thermal_a1_cpu_param = {
.regmap_config = &amlogic_thermal_regmap_config_g12a,
};
+static const struct amlogic_thermal_data amlogic_thermal_a9_param = {
+ .use_sm = true,
+ .has_sysclk = true,
+ .calibration_parameters = &amlogic_thermal_a9,
+ .regmap_config = &amlogic_thermal_regmap_config_g12a,
+ .reset_temp = 110000,
+};
+
static const struct amlogic_thermal_data amlogic_thermal_t7_param = {
.use_sm = true,
.calibration_parameters = &amlogic_thermal_g12a,
@@ -291,6 +368,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_amlogic_thermal_match[] = {
.compatible = "amlogic,a1-cpu-thermal",
.data = &amlogic_thermal_a1_cpu_param,
},
+ {
+ .compatible = "amlogic,a9-thermal",
+ .data = &amlogic_thermal_a9_param,
+ },
{
.compatible = "amlogic,t7-thermal",
.data = &amlogic_thermal_t7_param,
@@ -305,6 +386,7 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
void __iomem *base;
int ret;
+ u32 reset_temp;
pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pdata)
@@ -323,9 +405,18 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap))
return PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap);
- pdata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(pdata->clk))
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->clk), "failed to get clock\n");
+ if (pdata->data->has_sysclk) {
+ pdata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core");
+ if (IS_ERR(pdata->clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->clk), "failed to get core clk\n");
+ pdata->sysclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "pclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(pdata->sysclk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->sysclk), "failed to get pclk\n");
+ } else {
+ pdata->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(pdata->clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pdata->clk), "failed to get clock\n");
+ }
if (pdata->data->use_sm)
ret = amlogic_thermal_probe_sm(pdev, pdata);
@@ -346,6 +437,17 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(&pdev->dev, pdata->tzd);
+ if (pdata->data->reset_temp) {
+ reset_temp = pdata->data->reset_temp;
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "using default hardware reset temperature\n");
+ reset_temp = TSENSOR_HW_RESET_DEFAULT_TEMP;
+ }
+
+ pdata->temp_code = amlogic_thermal_millicelsius_to_code(pdata, reset_temp);
+
+ amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset(pdata);
+
ret = amlogic_thermal_enable(pdata);
return ret;
@@ -363,6 +465,8 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct amlogic_thermal *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
amlogic_thermal_disable(data);
+ if (data->data->has_sysclk)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(data->sysclk);
return 0;
}
@@ -371,6 +475,9 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct amlogic_thermal *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ if (data->data->has_sysclk)
+ clk_prepare_enable(data->sysclk);
+ amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset(data);
return amlogic_thermal_enable(data);
}
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
@ 2026-08-25 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-25 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xianwei Zhao; +Cc: linux-amlogic, conor+dt, devicetree, neil.armstrong, robh
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Critical] Unclocked MMIO register access in probe and resume causes bus faults on legacy SoCs.
- [High] A9-specific hardware over-temperature reset is unconditionally enabled on all legacy SoCs with incorrect bitmask.
- [Medium] Missing error check for `clk_prepare_enable()` and missing clock unwind in `amlogic_thermal_resume()`.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Invalid manual two's complement on unsigned type breaks negative temperature calculations on 32-bit systems.
- [High] Thermal zone registered and polled before hardware clocks are enabled.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller ---
commit 722761d3d79caeb86bd5f0b65fa45692c9e109e1
Author: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller
Add support for the Amlogic A9 thermal controller with different
calibration parameters, separate core/bus clocks, and hardware reset
capabilities.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c
> index a0b530624b60c..74f0bc49c737b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/amlogic_thermal.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -138,6 +157,49 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_code_to_millicelsius(struct amlogic_thermal *pdata,
> return temp;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Calculate a temperature code from a temperature value .
> + * The unit of the temperature is degree milliCelsius.
> + */
> +static u32 amlogic_thermal_millicelsius_to_code(struct amlogic_thermal *pdata, int millicelsius)
> +{
> + const struct amlogic_thermal_soc_calib_data *param =
> + pdata->data->calibration_parameters;
> + s64 factor, uptat, uefuse;
> + u32 temp_code;
> +
> + uefuse = pdata->trim_info & TSENSOR_TRIM_SIGN_MASK ?
> + ~(pdata->trim_info & TSENSOR_TRIM_TEMP_MASK) + 1 :
> + (pdata->trim_info & TSENSOR_TRIM_TEMP_MASK);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this manual two's complement logic
break negative temperature calculations on 32-bit systems?
Because TSENSOR_TRIM_TEMP_MASK is derived from GENMASK (an unsigned long),
the bitwise NOT results in an unsigned 32-bit integer (e.g., 0xFFFFFFFB
for -5). When assigned to the 64-bit signed integer uefuse, it gets
zero-extended to 4294967291 instead of sign-extended to -5.
Since this bug was duplicated into the new amlogic_thermal_millicelsius_to_code
function from amlogic_thermal_code_to_millicelsius, should both locations
be fixed to prevent over-temperature protection from miscalculating?
> +
> + factor = param->B + div_s64(millicelsius, 100);
[ ... ]
> +static void amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset(struct amlogic_thermal *data)
> +{
> + regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_CODE,
> + data->temp_code << 0x4);
> + regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2,
> + TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_ENABLE, TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_ENABLE);
[Severity: High]
Does this write an incorrect bitmask into the TSENSOR_CFG_REG2 register?
The macro TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_ENABLE includes TSENSOR_CFG_REG2_REBOOT_TIME,
which is defined as GENMASK(23, 16). Passing this macro as both the mask
and the value to regmap_update_bits() sets all bits of GENMASK(23, 16)
to 1, hardcoding the maximum reboot time (0xFF) instead of leaving it as
a configured value.
> +}
> +
[ ... ]
> @@ -346,6 +437,17 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(&pdev->dev, pdata->tzd);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does registering the thermal zone slightly
earlier in this probe function trigger a synchronous external abort?
Calling devm_thermal_of_zone_register() causes the thermal core to
synchronously invoke the .get_temp callback to initialize trip points. This
attempts an MMIO read via regmap_read(pdata->regmap, TSENSOR_STAT0) before
amlogic_thermal_enable() is called to enable the clocks.
> + if (pdata->data->reset_temp) {
> + reset_temp = pdata->data->reset_temp;
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "using default hardware reset temperature\n");
> + reset_temp = TSENSOR_HW_RESET_DEFAULT_TEMP;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this apply an A9-specific hardware over-temperature reset configuration
unconditionally to all legacy SoCs (G12A, A1, T7)?
Older platforms may not support the TSENSOR_CFG_REG2 register, which could
lead to hardware misconfiguration or unintended reboots.
> +
> + pdata->temp_code = amlogic_thermal_millicelsius_to_code(pdata, reset_temp);
> +
> + amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset(pdata);
> +
> ret = amlogic_thermal_enable(pdata);
[Severity: Critical]
Will calling amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset() before amlogic_thermal_enable()
trigger a synchronous external abort (bus hang) on legacy SoCs?
amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset() performs an MMIO regmap write to
TSENSOR_CFG_REG2. On platforms where the thermal IP relies entirely on
pdata->clk, this clock is left disabled until amlogic_thermal_enable()
is called on the very next line, which means we are writing to hardware
registers while the IP's clock is gated.
>
> return ret;
[ ... ]
> @@ -371,6 +475,9 @@ static int amlogic_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct amlogic_thermal *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> + if (data->data->has_sysclk)
> + clk_prepare_enable(data->sysclk);
[Severity: Medium]
Is an error check missing for clk_prepare_enable() here?
If it fails, the driver will proceed to access hardware, resulting in a bus
fault.
Additionally, if sysclk is enabled successfully but the subsequent
amlogic_thermal_enable() fails, the function returns the error code without
disabling sysclk, which leaks the clock enable count.
> + amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset(data);
> return amlogic_thermal_enable(data);
[Severity: Critical]
Similar to the probe function, does amlogic_tsensor_setup_hw_reset()
perform an unclocked MMIO write here?
amlogic_thermal_enable() prepares and enables the core thermal clock, but
it is called after the hardware reset configuration is written.
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825-a9-thermal-v4-0-d8fc9859cf22@amlogic.com?part=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-25 6:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-25 6:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] thermal: Add support A9 Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: amlogic: Add A9 thermal bindings Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] thermal: amlogic: Add support for A9 thermal controller Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-08-25 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox