From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aleksei Sviridkin" <f@lex.la>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/9] net: phylink: wait for PHYs that are known to probe late
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 05:26:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830052623.408C81F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260829052546.1152446-9-f@lex.la>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] pl->phydev is left as a dangling pointer if phylink_bringup_phy() fails, causing an infinite -EBUSY retry loop and a subsequent double-free/UAF.
--
commit 041169a410024c4510d91d095a3546cc79dd0bb6
Author: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
net: phylink: wait for PHYs that are known to probe late
A PHY whose driver or firmware lives on a filesystem mounted after the MAC
probes cannot be connected when the port is set up. This commit allows a port
to specify slow-to-probe, polling for the PHY instead of failing. It waits
for the PHY's driver to finish probing and re-tries on failures.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 3ec3bb4391095..62e6059a18da3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2254,6 +2277,129 @@ int phylink_connect_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phylink_connect_phy);
>
[ ... ]
> +static void phylink_slow_phy_poll(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = phylink_bringup_phy(pl, phy_dev,
> + pl->link_config.interface);
> + if (ret)
> + phy_detach(phy_dev);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the existing lack of rollback
in phylink_bringup_phy() is exacerbated by this new background poller, which
turns it into an infinite background loop and a guaranteed crash on teardown.
If phylink_bringup_phy() fails later in its execution (for example, if
phy_eee_rx_clock_stop() returns an error), it returns that error but leaves
pl->phydev pointing to the PHY:
drivers/net/phy/phylink.c:phylink_bringup_phy() {
...
pl->phydev = phy;
...
ret = phy_eee_rx_clock_stop(phy, pl->config->eee_rx_clk_stop_enable);
if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
ret = 0;
...
return ret;
}
Because pl->phydev remains populated after the failure, the poller calls
phy_detach() which drops the refcount. On the next poll cycle,
phylink_attach_phy() will unconditionally return -EBUSY because pl->phydev
is already set.
Furthermore, when the interface is later brought down and
phylink_disconnect_phy() is called, it finds pl->phydev set and calls
phy_disconnect(). This calls phy_detach() a second time on the
already-detached PHY, causing a double-put and use-after-free.
Should phylink_bringup_phy() clear pl->phydev on error, or should the caller
clear it if the bringup fails?
> + else if (!test_bit(PHYLINK_DISABLE_STOPPED,
> + &pl->phylink_disable_state))
> + /* phylink_start() starts the PHY it finds attached,
> + * and ran long before this one turned up.
> + */
> + phy_start(phy_dev);
> + }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260829052546.1152446-1-f@lex.la?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-29 5:25 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] net: survive a PHY whose firmware arrives after the MAC probes Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/9] dt-bindings: net: add Airoha EN8811H PHY MCU Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/9] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-controller: add slow-to-probe Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-30 5:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 0:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/9] net: phy: air: type the buckpbus core on the bus and address Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-09-04 0:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/9] net: phy: air: move the EN8811H firmware download into the library Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-09-04 1:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/9] net: phy: air: skip the download when the MD32 is already running Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/9] net: mdio: add Airoha EN8811H MDIO device driver Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-30 5:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 1:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 7/9] net: mdio: en8811h: add the nested pass-through bus Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-09-04 1:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 8/9] net: phylink: wait for PHYs that are known to probe late Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-30 5:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-29 5:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 9/9] net: phylink: report no link modes while a late PHY is missing Aleksei Sviridkin
2026-08-30 5:26 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830052623.408C81F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f@lex.la \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox