From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:33:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909143312.0F9041F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909-mcp47feb02_refactor-v5-3-8b67bcab93d1@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but suspend and resume operations clobber the user-configured channel powerdown state.
--
commit 835e4538da01c3026ccf6237cb4357a864fa680c
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store
This commit modifies store_eeprom_store() to return the input buffer
length instead of 0 when state is false. This properly signals that the
buffer was fully consumed, preventing unnecessary write retries.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> index bf78618ac2c89..2ee981393aa1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static ssize_t store_eeprom_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *a
> return ret;
>
> if (!state)
> - return 0;
> + return len;
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but suspend and resume operations clobber the
user-configured channel powerdown state.
Looking at mcp47feb02_suspend():
drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c:mcp47feb02_suspend() {
...
for_each_set_bit(ch, &data->active_channels_mask, data->phys_channels) {
u8 pd_mode;
data->chdata[ch].powerdown = true;
...
}
Does this unconditionally overwrite the channel's powerdown state during
suspend, causing the user's prior configuration to be permanently lost?
Similarly, looking at mcp47feb02_resume():
drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c:mcp47feb02_resume() {
...
for_each_set_bit(ch, &data->active_channels_mask, data->phys_channels) {
u8 pd_mode;
int ret;
data->chdata[ch].powerdown = false;
...
ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, MCP47FEB02_POWER_DOWN_REG_ADDR,
DAC_CTRL_MASK(ch),
DAC_CTRL_VAL(ch, MCP47FEB02_NORMAL_OPERATION));
...
}
Could this force all channels out of powerdown during resume, ignoring any
user-configured disabled state? Waking up a DAC channel that was explicitly
powered down by the user via sysfs could drive unintended voltage to attached
hardware upon system resume.
> /*
> * Verify DAC Wiper and DAC Configuration are unlocked. If both are disabled,
> * writing to EEPROM is available.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909-mcp47feb02_refactor-v5-0-8b67bcab93d1@microchip.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 14:18 [PATCH v5 00/10] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: initialize dac_data field in channel data struct at probe Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Fix gain field initialization for active channels Ariana Lazar
2026-09-13 21:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Increase EEPROM Programming Write Cycle Time Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 6:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe failure on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 6:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct typo from a comment Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: rename command mask define Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 6:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-13 21:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-09 14:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 6:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-10 6:18 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-13 21:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909143312.0F9041F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox