Re: [PATCH v9 5/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Add bindings for MT6735 pin controller

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] MAINTAINERS references nonexistent mt6735-pinctrl.h file
--

commit 9e8afc5717d48e9d3432a4b635154c2d3231da7e
Author: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>

dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Add bindings for MT6735 pin controller

This commit adds device tree bindings for the MT6735 pin controller. It
updates the YAML schema and MAINTAINERS file, and introduces a new header
with pinmux definitions.

> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9765e8a72dc78..3b309160440b8 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -21850,6 +21850,12 @@ F:	drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-rt2880.c
>  F:	drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-rt305x.c
>  F:	drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-rt3883.c
>  
> +PIN CONTROLLER - MEDIATEK MT6735
> +M:	Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
> +L:	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> +S:	Maintained
> +F:	include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6735-pinctrl.h

[Severity: Low]
Does this MAINTAINERS entry reference a file that does not exist?

The patch actually adds include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6735-pinfunc.h
to the tree, but this line points to mediatek,mt6735-pinctrl.h instead.

Could this cause the get_maintainer script to silently fail to match the
header file, potentially leaving the maintainer unnotified of future changes?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925-mt6735-pinctrl-v9-v9-0-bfb19d8bb87c@protonmail.com?part=5