From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, ulfh@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
ogabbay@kernel.org, zhangqing@rock-chips.com,
Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Cc: royalnet026@gmail.com, abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com,
sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, sidong.yang@furiosa.ai,
u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com, chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com,
diederik@cknow-tech.com, alchark@flipper.net, leonard@lausen.nl,
jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com, rfoss@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 03/15] accel/rocket: wait for a running IRQ handler before resetting a core
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 23:47:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3654048.cLl3JjQhRp@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101082307.151957-4-gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2026, 09:22:55 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Jiaxing Hu:
> drm_sched_stop() does not wait for a threaded handler that is already
> running. Call synchronize_irq() after it, outside job_lock, which the
> handler takes.
>
> Before the sync, mask the block's interrupt and clear its raw status, so
> that an active core cannot signal a completion after it. Do that under
> job_lock, since rocket_job_hw_submit() arms the same mask under that lock,
> and only when pm_runtime_get_if_active() returns a positive count: the
> reset holds no runtime PM reference, and with the domain down a register
> access takes an async SError.
>
> Igor Paunovic's induced-reset runs on RK3588, including a two-task job that
> puts hw_submit() on the IRQ thread, found no fault; as he put it, "this
> does not show the race is closed".
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260819073530.6087-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEWPSH5mxTbUkNouxm6yecMZYvDowquhvYvhaXQ8HoMtHD5U1g@mail.gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260912113717.6819-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260916132824.13527-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260919103422.148834-1-royalnet026@gmail.com/
> Suggested-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
> Tested-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com> # RK3588, three cores, induced reset, JOB_TIMEOUT_MS=2
> ---
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> index 03e5f094f60b..5b2abf40b618 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> @@ -401,9 +401,74 @@ rocket_reset(struct rocket_core *core, struct drm_sched_job *bad)
> drm_sched_stop(&core->sched, bad);
>
> /*
> - * Remaining interrupts have been handled, but we might still have
> - * stuck jobs. Let's make sure the PM counters stay balanced by
> - * manually calling pm_runtime_put_noidle().
> + * Mask the block before waiting. hw_submit() arms INTERRUPT_MASK on
> + * every submit and only the hardirq clears it, so on an ordinary
> + * timeout it is still live and a completion can arrive after the sync
> + * returns. The next submit re-arms it, so nothing is lost here.
> + *
> + * Only when the device is already awake, though. This function holds no
> + * runtime PM reference of its own: the only one in the window belongs to
> + * in_flight_job, and the completion path may have put it and cleared the
> + * pointer before the timeout worker got here. drm_sched_stop() above can
> + * block for a long time, and it drops every pending job's credits, so
> + * rocket_job_is_idle() is true and nothing keeps the core resumed. On
> + * this hardware a register access with the domain down takes an async
> + * SError, so a reset must not be the thing that causes one.
> + *
> + * Only a positive answer will do. pm_runtime_get_if_active() tests
> + * power.disable_depth before power.runtime_status, so -EINVAL MASKS a
> + * suspended device rather than excluding one: pm_runtime_force_suspend(),
> + * which is this driver's own system suspend callback, disables runtime PM
> + * first and turns the clocks off second, and rocket_core_fini() suspends
> + * the core and disables before it cancels the timeout worker. Both leave
> + * the domain down with -EINVAL on offer.
> + *
> + * The cost is the other half of that ambiguity. A core that is still up
> + * with runtime PM disabled (pm_runtime_force_suspend() before its
> + * callback has run, or CONFIG_PM=n under COMPILE_TEST) is left unmasked,
> + * because writing to it would mean writing to the half that is down as
> + * well.
> + *
> + * Clear the raw status along with the mask, the way the completion path
> + * does. Masking alone leaves the DPU bit latched until
> + * rocket_core_reset(), and the hardirq decides on raw status alone, so a
> + * fault from the IOMMU that shares this line would wake the thread again
> + * and what the comment below asserts would stop being true.
> + *
> + * UNDER job_lock, because rocket_job_hw_submit() arms this same
> + * register and always runs under that lock. reset.pending is set here
> + * without the lock and read there with it, so a submit that has already
> + * passed its check can re-arm the mask after this clears it, and then
> + * the synchronize_irq() below fences a handler that is no longer the
> + * one that matters: the block is left running a task with its
> + * interrupt live. rocket_job_handle_irq() avoids the same race on
> + * OPERATION_ENABLE by making its completion writes under this lock.
> + *
> + * pm_runtime_get_if_active() does not invoke a callback -- it only
> + * takes a reference on an already-active device -- and
> + * pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() is asynchronous, so neither can re-enter
> + * this driver's runtime PM callbacks while the lock is held.
This can be way short please, the wall of text is very hard to read.
> + */
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &core->job_lock) {
> + if (pm_runtime_get_if_active(core->dev) > 0) {
> + rocket_pc_writel(core, INTERRUPT_MASK, 0x0);
> + rocket_pc_writel(core, INTERRUPT_CLEAR, 0x1ffff);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(core->dev);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * drm_sched_stop() returns without waiting for a threaded handler that
> + * is already running, so wait for one here. This has to stay outside
> + * job_lock: the handler takes that lock, so waiting for it while
> + * holding it would deadlock instead of fencing anything.
> + */
> + synchronize_irq(core->irq);
> +
> + /*
> + * No handler is running now, but we might still have stuck jobs. Let's
> + * make sure the PM counters stay balanced by manually calling
> + * pm_runtime_put_noidle().
> */
> scoped_guard(mutex, &core->job_lock) {
> if (core->in_flight_job)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 8:22 [PATCH v15 00/15] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 01/15] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-03 22:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-04 10:21 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 02/15] accel/rocket: take the completion register writes under job_lock Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-03 22:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 03/15] accel/rocket: wait for a running IRQ handler before resetting a core Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 22:47 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2026-11-03 22:50 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-04 12:55 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 04/15] accel/rocket: let the core suspend after a reset Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 10:25 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 05/15] accel/rocket: factor the completion tail out of the IRQ handler Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-04 10:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 06/15] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:37 ` [PATCH v15 06/15] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip, rk3576-rknn-core sashiko-bot
2026-11-01 8:22 ` [PATCH v15 07/15] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: allow resets in a power domain node Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 08/15] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: describe the RK3576 NPU MMU Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-04 11:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 09/15] pmdomain: rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 22:34 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 10/15] pmdomain: rockchip: cycle an optional power-domain reset on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-03 22:36 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 11/15] accel/rocket: select the per-core clock and reset counts from match data Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-02 1:52 ` Chaoyi Chen
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 12/15] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 13/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: add NPU core domain clocks and resets to rk3576 Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 14/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: add NPU (RKNN) nodes " Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-04 10:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-01 8:23 ` [PATCH v15 15/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable the NPU on rk3576-rock-4d Jiaxing Hu
2026-11-03 22:39 ` [PATCH v15 00/15] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Heiko Stübner
2026-11-04 10:09 ` Tomeu Vizoso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3654048.cLl3JjQhRp@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alchark@flipper.net \
--cc=chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=leonard@lausen.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox