From: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lee@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] regulator: qcom-pm8008: Add PM8010 mode support
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:47:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a25c942-eac3-4079-8ede-a41f45962499@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918165258.9FC791F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On 9/18/2026 10:22 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] redundant use of to_i2c_client() when accessing of_node
> --
>
> commit f34c6623337a92a1f38e24ae60d1ae6ced8eed2d
> Author: Dhruvin Rajpura <drajpura@qti.qualcomm.com>
>
...
>>
>> + is_pm8010 = of_device_is_compatible(to_i2c_client(dev->parent)->dev.of_node,
>> + "qcom,pm8010-i2c");
>> +
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Is there a reason to use to_i2c_client() when accessing of_node in
> pm8008_regulator_probe()?
>
> Since to_i2c_client() is defined as container_of(d, struct i2c_client, dev),
> accessing the dev member of the resulting structure evaluates back to the
> exact original pointer (dev->parent).
>
> The expression to_i2c_client(dev->parent)->dev.of_node is functionally
> identical to simply using dev->parent->of_node, making the macro usage
> entirely redundant.
I'll make this fix in the next version of this series.
Thanks,
Jishnu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 16:42 [PATCH 0/6] mfd: qcom-pm8008: Add support for PM8010 over I2C Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: Add qcom,pm8010-i2c compatible Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 19:48 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-18 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] regulator: pm8008: Add PM8010 support Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] regulator: qcom-pm8008: Add PM8010 mode support Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 10:17 ` Jishnu Prakash [this message]
2026-09-18 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] mfd: qcom-pm8008: Add PM8010 support Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 10:17 ` Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-21 13:33 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-23 10:18 ` Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-01 8:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-09-18 16:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: Make interrupts optional Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 19:49 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-18 16:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] mfd: qcom-pm8008: Tolerate missing interrupt Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-18 16:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 10:42 ` Lee Jones
2026-09-23 10:17 ` Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-23 10:17 ` Jishnu Prakash
2026-09-19 13:01 ` [PATCH 0/6] mfd: qcom-pm8008: Add support for PM8010 over I2C Oleg Keri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a25c942-eac3-4079-8ede-a41f45962499@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox