Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Maili SoC compatible

[Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 8/19/2026 5:05 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8/19/26 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/08/2026 10:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 8/19/26 9:02 AM, Yijie Yang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/19/2026 2:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 19/08/2026 08:28, Yijie Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>>>>>>> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ properties:
>>>>>>>>                   - qcom,kaanapali-qrd
>>>>>>>>               - const: qcom,kaanapali
>>>>>>>>     +      - items:
>>>>>>>> +          - const: qcom,maili
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heh? This cannot go alone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep only the SoC compatible string and exclude the board for now, as
>>>>>> the latter is not currently used.
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260622-brainy-rapid-tody-dd7c3a@quoll/
>>>>>
>>>>> No, read my message there - this should be rejected! I even wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "But if ever this commit is used in argument "oh, compatible without
>>>>> user was accepted here by Krzysztof, so I can do the same", I will
>>>>> simply NAK such future contribution without reading the rest."
>>>>>
>>>>> So NAK because you did not even bother to read what I already stated!
>>>>
>>>> In patch 2/2, pd-mapper serves as the user. Is there any other reason to reject this binding?
>>>
>>> This defines/allows a top-level compatible of
>>>
>>> compatible = "qcom,maili";
>>>
>>> which is missing the board part, and that is strictly required.
>>
>> Not sure if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing...
> 
> Agreeing - I'm saying that we need the board compatible to be present
> in the tuple, which the submission doesn't contain
> 
> Konrad

Okay, will hold this binding for now.

-- 
Best Regards,
Yijie