Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for IQ-8275-evk board

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 6/26/25 10:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2025 17:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 6/23/25 5:46 PM, 'Rob Herring (Arm)' via kernel wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:34:18 +0530, Umang Chheda wrote:
>>>> This series:
>>>>
>>>> Add support for Qualcomm's IQ-8275-evk board using QCS8275 SOC.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml         |   7 +
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
>>>>  .../boot/dts/qcom/qcs8275-iq-8275-evk.dts     | 241 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  3 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8275-iq-8275-evk.dts
>>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/' for 20250623130420.3981916-1-umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com:
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-gt58.dtb: panel@0 (samsung,lsl080al03): 'port' does not match any of the regexes: '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
>>> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/samsung,s6d7aa0.yaml#
>>
>> Seems like a fluke..
> No, it is a correct report. Schema does not allow port and needs to be
> fixed.
> 
> What's more, this would be pointed out if contributor checked their DTS,
> so obviously this never happened.
> 
> Internal guideline already asks for it, we asked for it, so why this
> keeps happening?

What I'm saying is, look at the diffstat that I purposefully kept above
- unless modifying qcom.yaml retriggered it (but not any other errors?)

Konrad