Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: bluetooth: qca: add QCC2072

[Rahul Samana <rahul.samana@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 31-07-2026 15:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 09:15:01PM +0530, Rahul Samana wrote:
>> QCC2072 can be used on M.2 E-key cards where the card power resources are
>> described by the pcie-m2-e-connector node. In that setup, the M.2 power
>> sequencing provider creates the Bluetooth serdev child after matching the
>> QCC2072 PCI function.
>>
>> Integrated non-M.2 designs need board-specific power resources. Document
>> only the compatible for now and leave those properties to be added with
>> matching driver support.
>>
>> Document the qcom,qcc2072-bt compatible used for QCC2072 Bluetooth
>> controllers connected over UART.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Samana <rahul.samana@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> NAK, exactly same comments as before.
> 
> Nothing got improved, although what is weird - original SoB is gone, so
> this is legally dubious work.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for the review.

For the binding contents, I tried to capture the current scope in the binding
description itself. This series supports QCC2072 only as an M.2 E-key card,
where the card power resources are described by the pcie-m2-e-connector node
and the M.2 pwrseq provider creates the Bluetooth serdev child.

The binding also says:

  Integrated non-M.2 designs require board-specific power resources. Those
  properties, together with a static devicetree example, should be added when
  integrated non-M.2 support is added.

We do not currently have an integrated non-M.2 QCC2072 design, so I do not
have board-specific regulator supplies to document for that topology.

Could you please suggest how you would prefer this binding to be handled for
the current M.2-only use case? 

For the authorship concern, I mentioned the earlier QCC2072 contributions in
the cover letter, but I understand that is not sufficient. Since this still
documents the same qcom,qcc2072-bt compatible introduced by the earlier
work, I will carry the earlier authorship / Signed-off-by chain in v3.

Regards,
Rahul