Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: c3: Add support for power domains controller

[Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>]

Hi Dmitry,
    Thanks for your advise.

On 2023/7/4 03:37, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/07/2023 11:31, =Xianwei Zhao wrote:
>>> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for C3 Power controller. C3 power control
>>> registers are in secure domain, and should be accessed by SMC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>>> index 25b4b71df9b8..39ccc8f2e630 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>>    #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-a1-power.h>
>>>    #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-s4-power.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/amlogic-c3-power.h>
>>>    #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>>>    #include <linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h>
>>>    #include <linux/module.h>
>>> @@ -132,6 +133,22 @@ static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc s4_pwrc_domains[] = {
>>>      SEC_PD(S4_AUDIO,        0),
>>>    };
>>> +static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc c3_pwrc_domains[] = {
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_NNA,  0),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_AUDIO,        GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_SDIOA,        GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_EMMC, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_USB_COMB, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_SDCARD,       GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_ETH,  GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_GE2D, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_CVE,  GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_GDC_WRAP,     GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_ISP_TOP,              GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_MIPI_ISP_WRAP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>>> +   SEC_PD(C3_VCODEC,       0),
>>> +};
>>
>> Please move this struct before _s4_
>>
>>> +
>>>    static int meson_secure_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    {
>>>      int i;
>>> @@ -179,7 +196,7 @@ static int meson_secure_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>      for (i = 0 ; i < match->count ; ++i) {
>>>              struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain *dom = &pwrc->domains[i];
>>> -           if (!match->domains[i].index)
>>> +           if (!match->domains[i].name)
>>
>> Is this change necessary ? If yes please move it to another patch
>> and explain it's purpose. If it fixes something, add a Fixes tag so
>> it can be backported.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Neil
>>
> 
> I suppose, this change fixes the situation with SEC_PD(C3_NNA, 0)
> domain, because it has index == 0.
That's true.
> May be it's better to introduce the separate struct member for that? For
> example, 'present' (true or false).
> I think code would be more readable and clean.
> > [...]
> 
> --
> Thank you,
> Dmitry