Re: [PATCH 3/3] fbdev/simplefb: Add support for interconnect paths

["Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>]

On Fri Jun 20, 2025 at 2:36 PM CEST, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 20.06.25 um 14:07 schrieb Luca Weiss:
>> On Fri Jun 20, 2025 at 1:28 PM CEST, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 20.06.25 um 13:07 schrieb Luca Weiss:
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri Jun 20, 2025 at 1:02 PM CEST, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 20.06.25 um 12:31 schrieb Luca Weiss:
>>>>>> Some devices might require keeping an interconnect path alive so that
>>>>>> the framebuffer continues working. Add support for that by setting the
>>>>>> bandwidth requirements appropriately for all provided interconnect
>>>>>> paths.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>>>> index be95fcddce4c8ca794826b805cd7dad2985bd637..ca73e079fd13550ddc779e84db80f7f9b743d074 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>>>>>     #include <linux/parser.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
>>>>> With alphabetical sorting:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>>> Thanks for the reviews!
>>>>
>>>> For both simpledrm.c and simplefb.c, the includes are not strictly
>>>> alphabetically sorted (1 mis-sort in simpledrm, 3 in simplefb), shall I
>>>> just try and slot it into the best fitting place, or make them sorted in
>>>> my patch? Or I can add a separate commit for each driver before to sort
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know!
>>> Best is to try to fit it into the <linux/*> block. In simpledrm, it's
>>> probably my mistake. Don't bother with sending an extra cleanup if you
>>> don't want to.
>> I was mostly asking whether this diff is okay as part of my patch (for
>> just adding <linux/interconnect.h>)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> index be95fcddce4c..f2efa4b51401 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>> @@ -13,18 +13,19 @@
>>    */
>>   
>>   #include <linux/aperture.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>   #include <linux/errno.h>
>>   #include <linux/fb.h>
>> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
>>   #include <linux/io.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>> -#include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
>> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> -#include <linux/clk.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_clk.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>   #include <linux/parser.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>   #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>   #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>   
>>
>> Or if you want this churn to be a separate commit. Either way is fine
>> with me, just trying to figure out the preferences of this subsystem :)
>
> If you want to resort the entries, please do so in a separate patch.

Ack, will do in v2!

Regards
Luca

>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Luca
>>