Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: socfpga: Add the Agilex7 series SoC's

[Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>]

On 4/14/26 02:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 09:45:52AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> The Agilex7 is a series of devices from Altera that are derived from
>> the Agilex family.
>>
>> The Agilex7F device supports PCIE 4.0 and DDR4. The Agilex7I device supports
>> PCIE 5.0 and DDR4, while the Agilex7M device supports DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5
>> and PCIE 5.0.
>>
>> All other peripherals from these devices are the same as the Agilex
>> device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
>> index 206686f3eebc..5ee09f8d4698 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
>> @@ -115,6 +115,16 @@ properties:
>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-nand
>>             - const: intel,socfpga-agilex5
>>   
>> +      - description: Agilex7 series F, I and M boards
>> +        items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex7m-socdk
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex7f
>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex7i
>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex7m
>> +          - const: intel,socfpga-agilex
> 
> And separate question - why previous soc "agilex" is used as fallback?
> Even more confusing.
> 

You're right. Sorry for the confusion. The Agilex7M, I, F devices are 
basically "agilex" devices with some few additions (PCIE, DDR5). Maybe I 
should place the Agilex7M/I/F devices into the "agilex" boards area?

Thanks,
Dinh