Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add imx-rproc-psci

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 07:37:36AM +0000, Jiafei Pan wrote:
> 
> NXP Confidential
> > On 13/08/2026 09:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 06:46:30PM +0800, Jiafei Pan wrote:
> > >> +
> > >> +description:
> > >> +  NXP i.MX SoCs integrate multiple Cortex-A cores. On certain i.MX
> > >> +  platforms, one or more of these cores can be offloaded to run RTOS
> > >> +  or bare-metal firmware as a remote processor, while the remaining
> > >> +  cores run Linux. The cores are powered on and off via PSCI (Power
> > >> +  State Coordination Interface) CPU_ON/CPU_OFF calls to the firmware.
> > >> +
> > >> +properties:
> > >> +  compatible:
> > >> +    items:
> > >> +      - enum:
> > >> +          - fsl,imx93-ca55-rproc
> > >> +      - const: fsl,imx-rproc-psci
> > >
> > > Hm? So you just ignored the feedback?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Ah, you just did not bother even to wait for my reply!
> >
> > After three months after my review, you send reply to my comments and
> > IMMEDIATELY you send v4 without waiting for me to address them.
> >
> > Srsly, if you have three months, then don't you think I deserve more than 1 hour?
> >
> > NAK
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof:
> 
> 
> Hi Mathieu,

You probably meant "Krzysztof".

> 
> I sincerely apologize for the poor timing. I was not familiar with the upstream contribution workflow — I did not realize I should wait for you to respond to my replies before sending a new version. I sent v4 immediately after replying to your comments out of ignorance, not disrespect.
> 
> You are absolutely right, and I should have given you adequate time to review my responses. I will make sure this does not happen again.
> 
> I will wait for your feedback before sending any further versions.
> 
> Thank you for your patience.
> 
> Best regards, Jiafei
>