From: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: nord: Split QUP1 SE2/SE3 into lane-pair functions
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:15:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoZVKWTtdCQSSvaH@QCOM-aGQu4IUr3Y> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000076bd-b3fd-42dc-bd43-96ee9492a638@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 05:27:34PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8/19/26 5:23 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > QUP1 SE2 and SE3 pack all four of their lanes pair-wise onto only two
> > pins each: lanes 0/1 (I2C SDA/SCL) at mux value 2 and lanes 2/3 (UART
> > TX/RX) at mux value 1, on gpio127/gpio128 and gpio129/gpio130
> > respectively.
>
> [...]
>
> > + msm_mux_qup1_se2_01,
>
> other drivers where this is necessary stick an 'l' before the
> lane indices, e.g. se2_l2, let's keep this
I can see that for single lane function. But for lane-pair function,
it's not a new thing with nord, and the naming convention seems to be
without 'l', based on what I see from shikra, eliza, hawi and maili
drivers.
>
> The bindings change must be separate
I understand that's mandatory for new feature changes, but for such
a bug fix where both binding and driver changes are closely coupled,
it seems more reasonable to not split.
Shawn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 15:23 [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: nord: Split QUP1 SE2/SE3 into lane-pair functions Shawn Guo
2026-08-19 15:27 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-08-20 1:15 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoZVKWTtdCQSSvaH@QCOM-aGQu4IUr3Y \
--to=shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox