From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Ernest Van Hoecke <ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM nexus maps
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:54:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq1CSswlo57jZpMH@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910143106.B457C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3280 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 02:31:06PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [Critical] Missing bounds check in `of_parse_phandle_with_args_map` allows a malformed Devicetree to trigger a stack buffer overflow.
> - [High] Missing cycle detection in `of_parse_phandle_with_args_map` allows a malformed Devicetree to cause an infinite loop.
> --
>
> commit 17ae1bc408452875cfad3c0d990add52c676f9b9
> Author: Ernest Van Hoecke <ernest.vanhoecke@toradex.com>
>
> of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM nexus maps
>
> PWM consumers use of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() to resolve specifiers
> through pwm-map properties. fw_devlink instead parses the pwms property
> as a direct phandle reference, so it records the nexus node as the
> supplier rather than the mapped PWM provider.
>
> Use the map-aware parser for pwms so fw_devlink resolves the same
> provider as the PWM consumer API. Direct PWM references continue to work
> because the map-aware parser returns the original provider when no
> pwm-map property is present.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/juuc4af7ndbajcl7gzf4tg5qz2q2j5tt3rvql4jbauradujrre@gc5nbdhhixaf/
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> > index eba7e9fe6c386..a9c51d639a2b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> > @@ -1426,7 +1435,7 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(extcon, "extcon", NULL)
> > DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(nvmem_cells, "nvmem-cells", "#nvmem-cell-cells")
> > DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(phys, "phys", "#phy-cells")
> > DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(wakeup_parent, "wakeup-parent", NULL)
> > -DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pwms, "pwms", "#pwm-cells")
> > +DEFINE_SIMPLE_NEXUS_PROP(pwms, "pwms", "pwm")
>
> [Severity: Critical]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this change exposes a
> pre-existing stack buffer overflow in of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() by
> parsing pwms properties automatically during early boot.
>
> Does this code overflow initial_match_array[]? If a provider node in a
> malformed Devicetree has a #pwm-cells property larger than MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS
> (16), list_size is read without bounds checking:
>
> drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
> ...
> /* Precalculate the match array - this simplifies match loop */
> for (i = 0; i < list_size; i++)
> initial_match_array[i] = cpu_to_be32(out_args->args[i]);
> ...
> }
>
> Because fw_devlink now automatically calls parse_nexus_prop() and
> of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() for all pwms properties, this regression can
> now be trivially triggered without requiring consumer drivers to probe.
Does this need
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index d71ae0449360..68d3eaa86742 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1579,6 +1579,9 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args_map(const struct device_node *np,
if (ret < 0)
goto put;
+ if (list_size > MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* Precalculate the match array - this simplifies match loop */
for (i = 0; i < list_size; i++)
initial_match_array[i] = cpu_to_be32(out_args->args[i]);
?
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 14:16 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: property: Make fw_devlink follow GPIO, PWM and clock nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-16 17:14 ` Linus Walleij
2026-09-16 17:43 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Report unsupported supplier linking Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 17:44 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with GPIO nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-16 17:14 ` Linus Walleij
2026-09-16 17:51 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:54 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2026-09-16 17:52 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-16 17:54 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow clock " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 18:15 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-16 18:19 ` Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aq1CSswlo57jZpMH@monoceros \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox