From: Joey Lu <a0987203069@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jacky Huang <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>,
Shan-Chun Hung <schung@nuvoton.com>,
Hui-Ping Chen <hpchen0nvt@gmail.com>, Joey Lu <yclu4@nuvoton.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: nuvoton,ma35d1-usb2-phy: extend for dual-port OTG support
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 09:49:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b002cf5f-4e1a-4181-b9c3-d4f3870bffe8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f5a408b-5c55-4cd2-831a-49316c9912c9@kernel.org>
On 6/30/2026 2:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/06/2026 12:40, Joey Lu wrote:
>> On 6/25/2026 3:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:39:56AM +0800, Joey Lu wrote:
>>>> properties:
>>>> compatible:
>>>> enum:
>>>> - nuvoton,ma35d1-usb2-phy
>>>>
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> "#phy-cells":
>>>> - const: 0
>>>> + const: 1
>>>> + description:
>>>> + The single cell selects the PHY port. 0 selects the OTG port (USB0,
>>>> + shared with DWC2 gadget controller) and 1 selects the host-only port
>>>> + (USB1).
>>>>
>>>> - clocks:
>>>> - maxItems: 1
>>> This is odd, considering that parent does not have clocks. So explain me
>>> this:
>>> 1. USB PHY needed clocks.
>>> 2. You extend USB PHY to cover second part.
>>> 3. That extension for second part means that clocks are not needed.
>>> Really, how? How is it possible in hardware?
>> The hardware has two independent clock domains:
>>
>> - The PHY analog block takes the 24 MHz HXT as its reference, wired
>> directly to the PHY's internal PLL, which derives the required
>> operating
>> frequencies internally. This reference path is entirely outside the SoC
>> software clock tree; no software-gatable clock gate needs to be enabled
>> for the PHY to power up and lock its PLL. The only software control the
>> PHY driver exercises is toggling each PHY's Power-On Reset (POR) bit,
>> which resides in the SYS register block. The driver accesses this via
>> the parent regmap
>>
>> - `HUSBH0_GATE` / `HUSBH1_GATE` / `USBD_GATE` are AHB/APB bus interface
>> clocks for the host and gadget (EHCI, OHCI, DWC2). They gate
>> the register-access path between the CPU and each controller, not
>> the PHY
>> analog circuitry itself.
>>
>> The original single-port driver enabled `HUSBH0_GATE` as if it belonged
>> to the
>> PHY, but that gate is actually owned by EHCI0/OHCI0 and is already
>> managed by
>> those controller drivers through their own `clocks` DTS bindings. The PHY
>> driver was redundantly enabling the same gate.
>>
>> When extending the driver to cover PHY1, the same pattern held: EHCI1/OHCI1
>> manage `HUSBH1_GATE` themselves. There is no clock that belongs
>> exclusively to
>> the PHY, so `clocks` will be dropped from the PHY binding entirely.
> What driver has to do with it?
>
> You did not answer the question. How adding missing OTG to existing
> device causes that hardware to lose a clock? How is it possible?
>
To answer the hardware question directly: adding OTG support does not
cause the hardware to lose a clock. The hardware clock topology is
identical in both the single-port and dual-port cases.
The PHY analog block derives its reference from the 24 MHz HXT crystal
through an always-on path via the PHY's internal PLL. No software-gated
clock in the kernel clock tree sits in this path. The PHY's power-on and
reset state is managed through USBPMISCR in the SYS register block, which
the driver accesses via the nuvoton,sys regmap outside the clock tree.
`HUSBH0_GATE` gates the AHB bus interface to the EHCI0/OHCI0 host
controllers that share PHY0. This relationship is the same in both the
single-port and dual-port configurations.
>>>> + nuvoton,rcalcode:
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>> + maxItems: 2
>>> You should require two values. I understand that any PHY is optional,
>>> thus you skip the entry, so how would you provide value for PHY1 only?
>> `nuvoton,rcalcode` will be changed to require exactly two values
>> (`minItems: 2, maxItems: 2`), one for PHY0 and one for PHY1 respectively.
>> The property will remain optional overall; when absent, each port
>> retains its
>> power-on default value loaded at hardware initialisation. When present, both
>> entries must be supplied.
> So are you going to implement it or not?
>
Yes, I will implement this change in the next version of the patchset.
>>>> + items:
>>>> + minimum: 0
>>>> + maximum: 15
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Resistor calibration trim codes for PHY0 and PHY1 respectively.
>>>> + Each 4-bit value is written to the RCALCODE field in USBPMISCR and
>>>> + adjusts the PHY's internal termination resistance. Both entries are
>>>> + optional; when absent the hardware reset default is used.
>>>>
>>>> - nuvoton,sys:
>>>> - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>> + nuvoton,oc-active-high:
>>>> + type: boolean
>>>> description:
>>>> - phandle to syscon for checking the PHY clock status.
>>>> + When present, the over-current detect input from the VBUS power switch
>>>> + is treated as active-high. The default (property absent) is active-low.
>>>> + This setting is shared by both USB host ports.
>>>>
>>>> required:
>>>> - compatible
>>>> + - reg
>>> That's ABI break which was not explained in the commit msg - neither
>>> specifying impact nor actually providing reasons why you break ABI.
>>>
>>> And honestly, you have no resources here except the address, so now it
>>> is clear that this should be folded into parent. See DTS101 talk slides.
>> The commit message will be updated to explicitly acknowledge the ABI break:
>> existing DTS files that contain a standalone `usb-phy` node without a `reg`
>> property will fail dt-schema validation after this change. The impact is
>> limited to the MA35D1 SoC; no upstream DTS for this SoC existed before this
>> patch series, so no in-tree board files are broken. The break is intentional
> But all of out of tree users are broken.
On reflection, the approach is being revised to eliminate the ABI break
entirely.
The next revision will keep the existing `nuvoton,ma35d1-usb2-phy` binding
intact with all its current required properties (`compatible`, `clocks`,
`nuvoton,sys`, `#phy-cells`). New OTG and dual-port capability will be
expressed as strictly optional backward-compatible additions:
- `#phy-cells` updated from `const: 0` to `enum: [0, 1]`. Existing DTS
with `#phy-cells = <0>` continues to validate and behave as before.
New DTS opting into dual-port uses `#phy-cells = <1>`.
- `nuvoton,rcalcode`: optional, exactly two values when present.
- `nuvoton,oc-active-high`: optional boolean.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 2:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] phy: nuvoton: extend MA35D1 USB2 PHY driver for dual-port OTG support Joey Lu
2026-06-25 2:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: reset: nuvoton,ma35d1-reset: add simple-mfd and child node support Joey Lu
2026-06-25 2:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 7:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-29 9:48 ` Joey Lu
2026-06-25 2:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: nuvoton,ma35d1-usb2-phy: extend for dual-port OTG support Joey Lu
2026-06-25 2:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 7:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-29 10:40 ` Joey Lu
2026-06-30 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-02 1:49 ` Joey Lu [this message]
2026-06-25 2:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: nuvoton: ma35d1: add USB controllers and dual-port PHY node Joey Lu
2026-06-25 2:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 2:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] phy: nuvoton: phy-ma35d1-usb2: extend to dual-port with OTG support Joey Lu
2026-06-25 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b002cf5f-4e1a-4181-b9c3-d4f3870bffe8@gmail.com \
--to=a0987203069@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpchen0nvt@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=schung@nuvoton.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=ychuang3@nuvoton.com \
--cc=yclu4@nuvoton.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox