public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tanmay.shah@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: document AMD BRAM-based rproc
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:09:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2ee8499-2ba2-42b2-bacc-18166135abbb@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ded8bbd-11b2-4552-80f5-972df15dc6e0@kernel.org>



On 4/28/26 11:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/04/2026 11:04, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/28/26 10:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 28/04/2026 10:33, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/28/26 08:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:27:02AM -0700, Ben Levinsky wrote:
>>>>>> Describe an AMD BRAM-based soft-core processor subsystem instantiated in
>>>>>> programmable logic and using dual-port BRAM for firmware storage and
>>>>>> execution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The binding models a soft-core processor subsystem instantiated in AMD
>>>>>> programmable logic and using dual-port BRAM for firmware storage and
>>>>>> execution. The remoteproc device is represented as a child node whose
>>>>>> reg property describes the firmware memory window in the processor-local
>>>>>> address space. The parent bus node provides standard devicetree address
>>>>>> translation through ranges so Linux can access the same BRAM through the
>>>>>> system physical address space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A clock input feeds the soft-core processor subsystem, and an active-low
>>>>>> reset GPIO holds the processor in reset until firmware loading
>>>>>> completes. The firmware-name property is optional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     .../bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml   | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
>>>>>>     create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..f16657dc0d9f
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
>>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>>>> +---
>>>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/amd,bram-rproc.yaml#
>>>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +title: AMD BRAM-based Remote Processor
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>>> +  - Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +description: |
>>>>>> +  Soft-core processor subsystem instantiated in AMD programmable logic and
>>>>>> +  using dual-port BRAM for firmware storage and execution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't the soft-core or FPGA still part of some Xilinx SoC? Or is this
>>>>> completely different thing from SoC and there is a design WITHOUT SoC
>>>>> using this remote proc?
>>>>
>>>> In 99% case this is going to be used on Xilinx SOC with programmable logic next
>>>> to ARM core.
>>>> soft core means - means VHDL/Verilog code synthesized to programmable
>>>> logic/fpga. It means exact location in chip varies based on build and constraints.
>>>>
>>>> hard core - physical HW location - like ARM cores in our chip.
>>>>
>>>> (ARM is providing RTL/code that even ARM cores in fpga emulated platforms are
>>>> actually used as soft cores).
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if you want me to talk about that 1% use cases which are also possible
>>>> but don't think anybody will design them.
>>>
>>> Then I would treat it exactly like every other block of a SoC - you need
>>> a SoC specific compatible. If there is a fallback, SoC specific
>>> compatible should be used in the fallback as well - that's all already
>>> documented in writing-bindings.
>>
>> But which SOC? We have ZynqMP, Versal, Versal NET, Versal Gen 2. And all of
>> these will use this configuration.
>> Do you want to list all of them?
> 
> "Then I would treat it exactly like every other block of a SoC"

No issue. Here is snippet.

   properties:
     compatible:
       items:
         - enum:
             - xlnx,zynqmp-bram-rproc
             - xlnx,versal-bram-rproc
             - xlnx,versal-net-bram-rproc
             - amd,versal2-bram-rproc
         - const: amd,bram-rproc

   The example should also be updated:

   examples:
     - |
       #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
       remoteproc@0 {
         compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-bram-rproc", "amd,bram-rproc";
         reg = <0x0 0x40000>;
         clocks = <&pl_clk>;
         firmware-name = "firmware.elf";
         reset-gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
       };

Thanks,
Michal


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27 16:27 [PATCH v2 0/2] remoteproc: add AMD BRAM-based remote processor driver Ben Levinsky
2026-04-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: document AMD BRAM-based rproc Ben Levinsky
2026-04-28  6:50   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-28  8:33     ` Michal Simek
2026-04-28  8:47       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-28  9:04         ` Michal Simek
2026-04-28  9:14           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-28 13:09             ` Michal Simek [this message]
2026-04-28 13:12               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-28 13:18                 ` Michal Simek
2026-04-28 13:28                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: add AMD BRAM-based remote processor driver Ben Levinsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2ee8499-2ba2-42b2-bacc-18166135abbb@amd.com \
    --to=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben.levinsky@amd.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox