Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
	Ritesh Kumar <quic_riteshk@quicinc.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: novatek,nt36672e: Document the reset GPIO polarity
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 22:27:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb1b7f4e-f03d-4422-b4ae-4228fe9f86ab@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61e36fb1-6959-4c69-9afb-53264ff9331d@kernel.org>

On 10/28/26 16:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/10/2026 15:56, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> We might fix it at some point, so not sure if it is worth documenting in
>>> the binding. And what about usage of this binding in other projects
>>> which implement it correctly?
>>>
>>
>> In the upstream there is only one user qcm6490-idp.dts, and changing
>> the polarity will be an ABI breaking change, unfortunately.
> 
> And all other projects?
> 

It might be a challenging task to check usage of "novatek,nt36672e"
compatible display panels in all other projects. I've asked about it:

* https://chatgpt.com/uc/6ae25571-2ef0-83ea-81e5-2522e70c4a93

The check gives this info:

1. Linux kernel - invalid GPIO polarity in the driver and qcm6490-idp.dts,
2. Android - invalid GPIO polarity in the copied driver and qcm6490-idp.dts,
3. FreeBSD - invalid GPIO polarity in the copied qcm6490-idp.dts, no driver.

Please let me know, if there are other projects to check. To my
understanding the RESET_N polarity cannot be corrected anymore,
and the best option is to clearly document a difference between
the device and its dt-binding documentation.

-- 
Best wishes,
Vladimir

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28  9:51 [PATCH 0/8] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672e: Add SM8450 HDK display card Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: novatek,nt36672e: Document the reset GPIO polarity Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28 13:56   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-28 14:56     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28 14:59       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-28 20:27         ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2026-10-29  9:49           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-29 10:30             ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: novatek,nt36672e: Add bias enable GPIO Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28 13:57   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672e: Make the AVDD and AVEE supplies optional Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672e: Support the bias enable GPIO Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672e: Verify the number of D-PHY data lanes Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/panel: novatek-nt36672e: Add support of the C-PHY panel module Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-hdk: Add display card overlay Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28 12:53   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-10-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Describe the panel bias enable GPIO Vladimir Zapolskiy
2026-10-28 12:54   ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb1b7f4e-f03d-4422-b4ae-4228fe9f86ab@kernel.org \
    --to=vz@kernel.org \
    --cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_riteshk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox