Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@quicinc.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: add description of CCI controllers
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:26:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d47ce3e8-8ce7-416f-be0f-2283575f24b2@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240410074951.447898-1-vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>

On 10/04/2024 09:49, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Qualcomm SM8650 SoC has three CCI controllers with two I2C busses
> connected to each of them.
> 
> The CCI controllers on SM8650 are compatible with the ones found on
> many other older generations of Qualcomm SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
> ---
> The change is based and depends on a patch series from Jagadeesh Kona:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240321092529.13362-1-quic_jkona@quicinc.com/
> 
> It might be an option to add this change right to the series,
> since it anyway requires a respin.
> 
> A new compatible value "qcom,sm8650-cci" is NOT added to
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml , because
> the controller IP description and selection is covered by a generic
> compatible value "qcom,msm8996-cci".

I do not understand this reasoning. So you introduce known errors
because errors are ok?

How does it pass dtbs_check validation?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-10  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-10  7:49 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: add description of CCI controllers Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-04-10  7:52 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-04-10 13:11   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-04-10 13:50     ` neil.armstrong
2024-04-10 15:19       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-04-10 15:26         ` neil.armstrong
2024-04-11  8:46           ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-04-11  9:57             ` neil.armstrong
2024-04-10  8:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-04-10 13:22   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2024-04-10 15:45     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-11 10:01 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-04-11 10:19 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-04-15 23:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-04-18 21:42   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d47ce3e8-8ce7-416f-be0f-2283575f24b2@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_jkona@quicinc.com \
    --cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox