From: Joey Lu <a0987203069@gmail.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Cc: ychuang3@nuvoton.com, schung@nuvoton.com, yclu4@nuvoton.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/verisilicon: add support for Nuvoton MA35D1 DCUltra Lite display controller
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:06:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfbc4042-64cf-49f2-a5de-12260beffaa0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b94806073de8bd1d79aa7ec956493f67679e46b.camel@iscas.ac.cn>
On 5/12/2026 4:11 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2026-05-12二的 15:45 +0800,Joey Lu写道:
>> On 5/11/2026 5:47 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>> 在 2026-05-11一的 15:51 +0800,Joey Lu写道:
>>>> The Nuvoton MA35D1 SoC integrates a Verisilicon DCUltra Lite
>>>> display
>>>> controller, which is a previous generation of the DC8000 series.
>>>> While
>>>> the general register layout is similar to the DC8000, there are
>>>> several
>>>> key differences that require per-variant handling in the driver.
>>>>
>>>> Add a vs_dc_info platform data structure (in vs_hwdb.h) to
>>>> describe
>>>> per-IP-variant capabilities, and use it throughout the driver to
>>>> select
>>>> the correct code paths at runtime.
>>>>
>>>> Key differences between DC8000 and DCUltra Lite handled:
>>> What the driver supports now is DC8200, DC8000 have the following
>>> point
>>> 1~4 the same with DCUltraLite (different to DC8200).
>> Understood. I'll rename all `vs_dc8000_*` identifiers to
>> `vs_dc8200_*` in v2. The commit message will also be corrected to say
>> that points 1~4 are differences from DC8200, not DC8000.
>>>> 1. No chip identity registers (0x0020-0x0030): DCUltra Lite uses
>>>> static
>>>> platform data instead of reading model/revision/customer_id
>>>> from
>>>> HW.
>>> My test shows that revision and customer_id is correctly present,
>>> only
>>> model is 0 -- I think this can be also considered as a valid model
>>> value because the IP name has also no model number.
>>>
>>> The revision number is 0x5560 and customer id is 0x305 .
>> Thank you for testing. I'll drop the `has_chip_id` flag
>> entirely. In v2, `vs_fill_chip_identity()` will be called for all
>> variants. A new entry will be added to `vs_chip_identities[]` in
>> vs_hwdb.c with model=0x0, revision=0x5560, customer_id=0x305,
>> display_count=1, and `vs_formats_no_yuv444`.
>> e.g. verisilicon-dc 40260000.display: Found DC0 rev 5560 customer 305
>>>> 2. No CONFIG_EX commit mechanism: DC8000 uses registers at 0x1CC0
>>>> (FB_CONFIG_EX), 0x24D8 (FB_TOP_LEFT), 0x24E0
>>>> (FB_BOTTOM_RIGHT),
>>>> 0x2510 (FB_BLEND_CONFIG), 0x2518 (PANEL_CONFIG_EX). DCUltra
>>>> Lite
>>>> omits all of these and instead uses enable/reset bits in
>>>> FB_CONFIG
>>>> (bit 0 = enable, bit 4 = reset) for direct framebuffer
>>>> updates.
>>>>
>>>> 3. No PANEL_START register (0x1CCC): DCUltra Lite panel output
>>>> starts
>>>> when PANEL_CONFIG.RUNNING is set; no separate multi-display
>>>> sync
>>>> start register is needed.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Different IRQ registers: DCUltra Lite uses 0x147C (IRQ_STA) /
>>>> 0x1480 (IRQ_EN); DC8000 uses 0x0010 (IRQ_ACK) / 0x0014
>>>> (IRQ_EN).
>>>>
>>>> 5. Different clock/reset topology: DCUltra Lite requires only
>>>> "core"
>>>> (bus gate) and "pix0" (pixel divider) clocks with no reset
>>>> lines
>>>> managed by the driver. DC8000 needs core/axi/ahb clocks and
>>>> three
>>>> resets.
>>> It's possible that your SoC integration combines core clock gate
>>> with
>>> bus clock gate instead of bus clock gate not existing.
>> Agreed. In v2 I'll remove the family-gated clock handling and
>> instead use `devm_clk_get_optional_enabled()` for the axi and ahb
>> clocks, so they are simply skipped if not present in DT. Resets are
>> already optional. This keeps the probe path uniform and handles any
>> SoC-specific clock combinations naturally.
> Maybe this could be splitted as another patch, to make single commits
> smaller.
Got it.
>>>> 6. Single output only: DCUltra Lite has one display output; per-
>>>> output
>>>> index logic is still in place but display_count is fixed at
>>>> 1.
>>>>
>>>> 7. Reduced register space: max_register is 0x2000 vs DC8000's
>>>> 0x2544.
>>>>
>>>> Add the "nuvoton,ma35d1-dcu" compatible string to the OF match
>>>> table,
>>>> extend Kconfig to allow building on ARCH_MA35 platforms, and
>>>> expose
>>>> vs_formats_no_yuv444 as the default format table for DCUltra Lite
>>>> (YUV444 blending is a DC8000-only feature).
>>>>
>>>> All changes have been tested on Nuvoton MA35D1 hardware and are
>>>> functioning correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joey Lu <a0987203069@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_bridge.c | 28 ++--
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_crtc.c | 13 +-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_dc.c | 129
>>>> ++++++++++++----
>>>> --
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_dc.h | 1 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_drm.c | 16 ++-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_hwdb.c | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_hwdb.h | 25 ++++
>>>> .../gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_primary_plane.c | 43 +++---
>>>> .../drm/verisilicon/vs_primary_plane_regs.h | 2 +
>>>> 10 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig
>>>> index 7cce86ec8603..295d246eb4b4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>> config DRM_VERISILICON_DC
>>>> tristate "DRM Support for Verisilicon DC-series display
>>>> controllers"
>>>> depends on DRM && COMMON_CLK
>>>> - depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> + depends on RISCV || ARCH_MA35 || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> select DRM_BRIDGE_CONNECTOR
>>>> select DRM_CLIENT_SELECTION
>>>> select DRM_DISPLAY_HELPER
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_bridge.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_bridge.c
>>>> index 7a93049368db..225af322de32 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_bridge.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_bridge.c
>>>> @@ -164,13 +164,16 @@ static void vs_bridge_enable_common(struct
>>>> vs_crtc *crtc,
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG_CLK_EN);
>>>> regmap_set_bits(dc->regs,
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG(output),
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG_RUNNING);
>>>> - regmap_clear_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START,
>>>> -
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START_MULTI_DISP_SYNC);
>>>> - regmap_set_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START,
>>>> - VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START_RUNNING(output));
>>>>
>>>> - regmap_set_bits(dc->regs,
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG_EX(crtc-
>>>>> id),
>>>> - VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG_EX_COMMIT);
>>>> + if (dc->info->has_config_ex) {
>>>> + regmap_clear_bits(dc->regs,
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START,
>>>> +
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START_MULTI_DISP_SYNC);
>>>> + regmap_set_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START,
>>>> + VSDC_DISP_PANEL_START_RUNNING(ou
>>>> tput
>>>> ));
>>>> +
>>>> + regmap_set_bits(dc->regs,
>>>> VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG_EX(crtc->id),
>>>> + VSDC_DISP_PANEL_CONFIG_EX_COMMIT
>>>> );
>>> Should the commit operation happen on DC8000/DCUltraLite too? (By
>>> writing to DcregFrameBufferConfig0.VALID).
>>>
>>> Many registers written has "Note: This field is double buffered" in
>>> the
>>> DCUltraLite documentation.
>>>
>>> I suggest create a static function for commit -- write to the
>>> corresponding commit bit on DC8200, and write to
>>> DcregFrameBufferConfig0.VALID on DC8000/DCUltraLite.
>> [a] There is no commit operation for DCUltra Lite.
>> I'll not add a `VSDC_FB_CONFIG_VALID` macro. VALID (BIT(3)) is a
>> hardware-managed double-buffer status bit: hardware writes 1=PENDING
>> when a new register set is ready and clears to 0=WORKING after the
>> VBLANK copy. Software must never write it, and there is no polling
>> use
> It seems to be writable and controls whether register buffering is
> enabled, see [1].
>
> The description of this bit in MA35D1 TRM says "This ensures a frame
> will always start with a valid working set if this register is
> programmed last, which reduces the need for SW to wait for the start of
> a VBLANK signal in order to ensure all states are loaded before the
> next VBLANK", which indicates some kind of "committing write", although
> the code at [1] seems to indicate that double buffering is only enabled
> when bit is cleared.
>
> Anyway this bit should be programmable, and "Software must never write
> it" contradicts with the MA35D1 TRM.
>
> Thanks,
> Icenowy
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/rockos-riscv/rockos-kernel/blob/rockos-v6.6.y/drivers/gpu/drm/eswin/es_dc_hw.c#L993
Thank you for the correction. I'll add
`#define VSDC_FB_CONFIG_VALID BIT(3)` to vs_primary_plane_regs.h and
write it in `vs_primary_plane_commit()` for non-config_ex variants.
>> case in the driver that requires a named constant. For non-config_ex
>> variants, `vs_primary_plane_commit()` performs no commit operation —
>> `VSDC_FB_CONFIG_ENABLE` (OUTPUT, BIT(0)) is set in
>> `vs_crtc_atomic_enable()` and `VSDC_FB_CONFIG_RESET` (BIT(4)) is
>> set/cleared in the bridge enable/disable paths.
> ========= 8< ==========
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 7:51 [PATCH 0/2] drm/verisilicon: add Nuvoton MA35D1 DCUltra Lite support Joey Lu
2026-05-11 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: verisilicon,dc: generalize for DCUltra Lite variant Joey Lu
2026-05-11 9:49 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-05-11 9:59 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-12 8:02 ` Joey Lu
2026-05-12 0:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-11 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/verisilicon: add support for Nuvoton MA35D1 DCUltra Lite display controller Joey Lu
2026-05-11 9:47 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-12 7:45 ` Joey Lu
2026-05-12 8:11 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-12 9:06 ` Joey Lu [this message]
2026-05-12 10:01 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-12 10:59 ` Joey Lu
2026-05-12 13:12 ` Icenowy Zheng
2026-05-12 1:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 8:24 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-05-12 9:10 ` Joey Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfbc4042-64cf-49f2-a5de-12260beffaa0@gmail.com \
--to=a0987203069@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=schung@nuvoton.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ychuang3@nuvoton.com \
--cc=yclu4@nuvoton.com \
--cc=zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox