Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: dma: qcom: bam-dma: Add support for kaanapali BAM v2.0.0

[Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 25-04-2026 15:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 05:04:15PM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>> Kaanapali support newer BAM v2.0.0 version.
>> Document the compatible string and update example along with it.
> 
> And why v2.0.0 is not compatible with v1.7.0? Or what is not compatible?

Kindly check patch 2/3 of series to understand register level 
differences in v1.7.0 to v2.0.0.

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml       | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>> index 6493a6968bb4..0923fb189ada 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ properties:
>>             - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
>>             # MSM8916, SDM630
>>             - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
>> +          # Kaanapali
>> +          - qcom,bam-v2.0.0
>>         - items:
>>             - enum:
>>                 # SDM845, SM6115, SM8150, SM8250 and QCM2290
>> @@ -118,4 +120,23 @@ examples:
>>           #dma-cells = <1>;
>>           qcom,ee = <0>;
>>       };
>> +  - |
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +
> 
> Drop the example, no need for difference in compatible.
The current example captures an old instance and doesn't give complete 
picture.
Example, doesn't specify iommus, qcom,controlled-remotely etc. whereas 
recent ones don't specify clocks and reg address/size cells are 2 not 1.

I believe current example doesn't give enough info and hence want to 
extend and highlight latest usage for either v1.7.4 or v2.0.0

Do you want me to have separate patch for this change if looks ok?

-- 
Regards
Kuldeep