From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Luka Panio" <lukapanio@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - move the controller bring-up into a helper
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 14:16:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175542@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261017140827.290666-3-lukapanio@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Input: edt-ft5x06: edt_ft5x06_ts_init_hw() registers device before IRQ
--
commit 5aab9a2f7e5d9f696c6cdfb8f9baf87581af8689
Author: Luka Panio <lukapanio@gmail.com>
Input: edt-ft5x06 - move the controller bring-up into a helper
This commit moves the controller reset release, hardware identification,
input device registration, and debugfs setup out of edt_ft5x06_probe()
into a new edt_ft5x06_ts_init_hw() helper function.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> index 543cc62088c7a..536d633d97a78 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
> @@ -1116,16 +1116,96 @@ static void edt_ft5x06_disable_regulators(void *arg)
> regulator_disable(data->iovcc);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Take the controller out of reset, identify it and register the input
> + * device.
> + */
> +static int edt_ft5x06_ts_init_hw(struct edt_ft5x06_ts_data *tsdata)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + error = input_register_device(input);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + edt_ft5x06_ts_prepare_debugfs(tsdata);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int edt_ft5x06_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
> const struct edt_ft5x06_chip_data *chip_data, u16 bustype,
> struct dentry *debugfs)
> {
[ ... ]
> @@ -1225,78 +1305,22 @@ int edt_ft5x06_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
[ ... ]
> + error = edt_ft5x06_ts_init_hw(tsdata);
> + if (error)
> return error;
> - }
>
> irq_flags = irq_get_trigger_type(irq);
> if (irq_flags == IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE)
> @@ -1310,12 +1334,6 @@ int edt_ft5x06_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
> return error;
> }
>
> - error = input_register_device(input);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - edt_ft5x06_ts_prepare_debugfs(tsdata);
> -
> dev_dbg(dev,
> "EDT FT5x06 initialized: IRQ %d, WAKE pin %d, Reset pin %d.\n",
> irq,
[Severity: Medium]
Previously, edt_ft5x06_probe() called devm_request_threaded_irq() before
calling input_register_device() and edt_ft5x06_ts_prepare_debugfs().
With edt_ft5x06_ts_init_hw() now running before devm_request_threaded_irq(),
the input device and debugfs files are published to userspace before the
touchscreen IRQ is requested.
If devm_request_threaded_irq() fails, the input device is announced to
userspace only to be immediately torn down during devres release.
Additionally, because edt_ft5x06_ts_prepare_debugfs() exposes the debugfs
mode file early, writing 1 to it before or during IRQ setup triggers:
edt_ft5x06_debugfs_mode_set()
-> edt_ft5x06_factory_mode()
disable_irq(tsdata->irq);
if (!tsdata->raw_buffer) {
tsdata->raw_bufsize = tsdata->num_x * tsdata->num_y *
sizeof(u16);
tsdata->raw_buffer = kzalloc(tsdata->raw_bufsize, GFP_KERNEL);
...
}
Can this cause disable_irq() (or enable_irq() on error or when switching
back in edt_ft5x06_work_mode()) to be called before the IRQ is requested, or
cause irq_startup() inside devm_request_threaded_irq() to re-enable the
interrupt while tsdata->factory_mode is true?
Also, if devm_request_threaded_irq() fails after tsdata->raw_buffer is
allocated, edt_ft5x06_remove() -> edt_ft5x06_ts_teardown_debugfs() is not
run on probe failure. Does this leak tsdata->raw_buffer?
Should devm_request_threaded_irq() be called before edt_ft5x06_ts_init_hw()
(for example, with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN if needed until the hardware is ready), or
should input_register_device() and edt_ft5x06_ts_prepare_debugfs() happen
after the IRQ is requested?
oggler
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261017140827.290666-1-lukapanio@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 14:07 [PATCH 0/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - add SPI transport and FocalTech FT8722 support Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - split the bus independent core from the I2C driver Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - move the controller bring-up into a helper Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - add an optional controller boot hook Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - allow a chip specific touch data register Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: edt-ft5x06: Add FocalTech FT8722 Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 6/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - add SPI transport and FT8722 support Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 14:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] Input: edt-ft5x06 - support following a DRM panel Luka Panio
2026-10-17 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175542@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukapanio@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox