* [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers for SA8775P, QCS8300 and SC7280
@ 2026-11-06 3:02 Anusha Arun Nandi
2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers Anusha Arun Nandi
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Bryan O'Donoghue
Cc: Abel Vesa, gjorgji.rosikopulos, hariram.purushothaman, akapatra,
jigarkumar.zala, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel
This series adds devicetree nodes for the generic Qualcomm MIPI CSI2
PHY driver on the three platforms whose compatibles/soc_cfg were added
by the companion "phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Add D-PHY support for SA8775P,
QCS8300 and SC7280".
Each CSIPHY is exposed as a standalone generic-PHY provider node at
its existing register address, with its own OF graph (port@0
sensor-facing, port@1 CAMSS-facing), so that camss_detect_legacy_phy()
picks the non-legacy path once a board wires a sensor through one of
them. The camss node's own reg-names/clocks/interrupts for the
CSIPHYs are left unchanged, so boards that don't use a provider still
fall back to the legacy in-driver CSIPHY handling. All provider nodes
are added disabled by default; a board or camera overlay enables the
one(s) it actually uses.
The three patches are otherwise independent and split one-per-SoC
since each touches a different dtsi file:
- Patch 1 adds the four SA8775P CSIPHYs (csiphy0-3) as
qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy nodes.
- Patch 2 adds the three QCS8300 CSIPHYs (csiphy0-2) as
qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy nodes.
- Patch 3 adds the five SC7280 CSIPHYs (csiphy0-4) as
qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy nodes.
This series depends on the compatible strings and soc_cfg entries
introduced by the driver series referenced below and should be applied
on top of it.
Depends-on: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105235137.2635442-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com/
Depends-on: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261102213936.1251316-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com/
Changes in v3:
- Patch 1 (lemans): moved csiphy_opp_table out of the soc@0 simple-bus
to the root node (a simple-bus's direct children need reg/ranges,
which an OPP table has neither of), dropped the opp-300000000 entry
(SA8775P's camcc only defines a 400 MHz rate for this clock, so it
was unreachable), and reordered csiphy0..3 after camss so soc@0's
children stay sorted by ascending unit address.
- Patch 2 (monaco): same csiphy_opp_table root-node move, and dropped
both the opp-300000000 entry and the extra "csiphy_rx" clock from
csiphy0..2 (QCS8300 binds through the sa8775p soc_cfg, which only
declares two clocks, "core"/"timer", for this PHY).
- Patch 3 (kodiak): same csiphy_opp_table root-node move; its
opp-300000000 and opp-400000000 entries are both kept, since
SC7280's camcc genuinely supports both rates for this clock.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261103221026.3662383-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com/
Changes in v2:
- Patch 1 (lemans): dropped the extra "csiphy_rx" clock from
csiphy0..3 (3 clocks -> 2: "core", "timer"), matching the driver's
sa8775p soc_cfg, which only declares two clocks for this SoC family.
- The "undocumented compatible" and "camss_detect_legacy_phy() does
not exist" comments on all three patches were resolved by the
companion phy-driver/binding series and CAMSS work landing, not by
a change to these dtsi patches themselves.
- Patches 2 (monaco) and 3 (kodiak) are otherwise unchanged from v1.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261017001116.2318647-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com/
Anusha Arun Nandi (3):
arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers
arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers
arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi | 104 ++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 412 insertions(+)
Best regards,
--
Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com>
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers 2026-11-06 3:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers for SA8775P, QCS8300 and SC7280 Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 ` Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:13 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi 2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: Abel Vesa, gjorgji.rosikopulos, hariram.purushothaman, akapatra, jigarkumar.zala, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel Expose the four SA8775p CSIPHYs as standalone qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy generic-PHY provider nodes (csiphy0..3) at their existing register addresses, each with its own OF graph (port@0 sensor-facing, port@1 CAMSS-facing) so camss_detect_legacy_phy() picks the non-legacy path once a board wires a sensor through one of them. The camss node's own reg-names/clocks/interrupts for the CSIPHYs are unchanged, so boards that don't use a provider still get the legacy binding. csiphy0..3 are placed after camss (ac78000 < ac9c000..aca2000), so soc@0's children stay sorted by ascending unit address. Their shared OPP table lives at the root node, not inside soc@0 (a simple-bus), since it has no reg/ranges property of its own; it only lists 400000000 Hz, the one rate SA8775P's camcc clock driver actually supports for this clock (ftbl_cam_cc_cphy_rx_clk_src has no 300 MHz entry). The provider nodes are disabled by default; a board or camera overlay enables the one(s) it uses. Reviewed-by: Jigarkumar Zala <jigarkumar.zala@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi index 1fdb72fa5518..6909dfa06d86 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi @@ -545,6 +545,14 @@ opp-100000000 { }; }; + csiphy_opp_table: opp-table-csiphy { + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; + + opp-400000000 { + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>; + }; + }; + pmu { compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -5348,6 +5356,134 @@ port@3 { }; }; + csiphy0: phy@ac9c000 { + compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ac9c000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy1: phy@ac9e000 { + compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ac9e000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY1_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI1PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 478 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy2: phy@aca0000 { + compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0aca0000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY2_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI2PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 479 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy3: phy@aca2000 { + compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0aca2000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY3_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI3PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + camcc: clock-controller@ade0000 { compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-camcc"; reg = <0x0 0x0ade0000 0x0 0x20000>; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:13 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-06 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Arun Nandi; +Cc: devicetree, robh, conor+dt Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: undocumented qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy compatible - [Medium] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: single power-domain in csiphy0..3 causes -EEXIST -- commit 03beee1895ec9b19424b0689817a5a264d09433f Author: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers This commit adds four standalone qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy generic-PHY provider nodes (csiphy0..3) and their shared OPP table to lemans.dtsi so boards can wire camera sensors through the non-legacy CAMSS PHY path. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi > index 1fdb72fa55184..6909dfa06d867 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi [ ... ] > @@ -5348,6 +5356,134 @@ port@3 { > }; > }; > > + csiphy0: phy@ac9c000 { > + compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy"; [Severity: Medium] As reported by Sashiko on v1 [1], is there a devicetree binding update and driver support accompanying qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy (used on csiphy0..csiphy3)? In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml, only qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy and qcom,glymur-csi2-phy are documented, so dtbs_check will fail on these nodes. In addition, phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_of_match_table in drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-core.c only matches qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy: static const struct of_device_id phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_of_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy", .data = &mipi_csi2_dphy_4nm_x1e }, { } }; When a board or overlay enables one of csiphy0..csiphy3 and wires a sensor endpoint through it, camss_probe() -> camss_init_subdevices() -> camss_detect_legacy_phy() in drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c sees the remote port parent node named phy and sets camss->legacy_phy = false. Then msm_csiphy_subdev_init() in drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c calls devm_phy_get_by_of_node(dev, remote): csiphy->phy = devm_phy_get_by_of_node(dev, remote); of_node_put(remote); if (IS_ERR(csiphy->phy)) { ret = PTR_ERR(csiphy->phy); goto done; } Without a driver matching qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy to register a PHY provider (and a corresponding 5nm v1.3.0 PHY configuration in drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-3ph-dphy.c), won't devm_phy_get_by_of_node() return -EPROBE_DEFER indefinitely? > + reg = <0x0 0x0ac9c000 0x0 0x2000>; > + > + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>, > + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core", > + "timer"; > + > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + > + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; > + > + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; > + power-domain-names = "top"; [Severity: Medium] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [2], will phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_probe() fail with -EEXIST when power-domains only contains a single entry on csiphy0..csiphy3? When a platform device has a single power-domains entry in DT, platform_probe() -> dev_pm_domain_attach() -> genpd_dev_pm_attach() in drivers/pmdomain/core.c attaches that domain directly to dev->pm_domain before the driver's probe callback runs: if (of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains", "#power-domain-cells") != 1) return 0; return __genpd_dev_pm_attach(dev, dev, 0, 1, true); When phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_probe() in drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-core.c subsequently calls phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_attach_pm_domains() -> devm_pm_domain_attach_list() -> dev_pm_domain_attach_list() in drivers/base/power/common.c: if (dev->pm_domain) return -EEXIST; dev_pm_domain_attach_list() returns -EEXIST because dev->pm_domain is already set, causing phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_probe() to fail. Furthermore, both Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml and drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-3ph-dphy.c expect three power domains (top, mmcx, mx) and three clocks (core, timer, ahb). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/sashiko-outbox-175063@kernel.org [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/sashiko-outbox-196105@kernel.org -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106030212.2811027-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers 2026-11-06 3:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers for SA8775P, QCS8300 and SC7280 Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 ` Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:13 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi 2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: Abel Vesa, gjorgji.rosikopulos, hariram.purushothaman, akapatra, jigarkumar.zala, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel Expose the three QCS8300 CSIPHYs as standalone qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy generic-PHY provider nodes (csiphy0..2) at their existing register addresses, each with its own OF graph (port@0 sensor-facing, port@1 CAMSS-facing) so camss_detect_legacy_phy() picks the non-legacy path once a board wires a sensor through one of them. The camss node's own reg-names/clocks/interrupts for the CSIPHYs are unchanged, so boards that don't use a provider still get the legacy binding. csiphy0..2 drop the extra "csiphy_rx" clock: QCS8300 binds through the sa8775p soc_cfg (no dedicated QCS8300 camcc driver exists), which only declares two clocks ("core", "timer") for this PHY, not three. csiphy_opp_table moves to the root node, not inside soc@0 (a simple-bus), since it has no reg/ranges property of its own; its opp-300000000 entry is dropped too, since QCS8300 shares SA8775P's camcc, whose cam_cc_cphy_rx_clk_src only defines a 400 MHz rate. The provider nodes are disabled by default; a board or camera overlay enables the one(s) it uses. Reviewed-by: Jigarkumar Zala <jigarkumar.zala@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi index 35fbee63d4c6..a66c04a1d306 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi @@ -644,6 +644,14 @@ opp-120000000 { }; }; + csiphy_opp_table: opp-table-csiphy { + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; + + opp-400000000 { + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>; + }; + }; + pmu-a55 { compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu"; interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; @@ -5577,6 +5585,102 @@ cci2_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 { }; }; + csiphy0: phy@ac9c000 { + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ac9c000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy1: phy@ac9e000 { + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ac9e000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY1_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI1PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 478 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy2: phy@aca0000 { + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0aca0000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY2_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI2PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 479 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + camss: isp@ac78000 { compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-camss"; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:13 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-06 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Arun Nandi; +Cc: devicetree, robh, conor+dt Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider: - [High] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: undocumented and unmatched qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy - [High] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: single power-domain on csiphy0..2 causes -EEXIST - [Low] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: csiphy0..2 placed before camss out of address order - [Low] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: commit message describes inter-version deltas -- commit 73bdfe66a74e3ebe09640aa912bd64a757bca278 Author: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers This commit adds an OPP table and three disabled standalone CSI2 PHY provider nodes (csiphy0, csiphy1, and csiphy2) to the Qualcomm Monaco (QCS8300) devicetree. > arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers > > Expose the three QCS8300 CSIPHYs as standalone > qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy generic-PHY provider nodes (csiphy0..2) at their > existing register addresses, each with its own OF graph (port@0 > sensor-facing, port@1 CAMSS-facing) so camss_detect_legacy_phy() picks > the non-legacy path once a board wires a sensor through one of them. > The camss node's own reg-names/clocks/interrupts for the CSIPHYs are > unchanged, so boards that don't use a provider still get the legacy > binding. > > csiphy0..2 drop the extra "csiphy_rx" clock: QCS8300 binds through the > sa8775p soc_cfg (no dedicated QCS8300 camcc driver exists), which only > declares two clocks ("core", "timer") for this PHY, not three. > > csiphy_opp_table moves to the root node, not inside soc@0 (a > simple-bus), since it has no reg/ranges property of its own; its > opp-300000000 entry is dropped too, since QCS8300 shares SA8775P's > camcc, whose cam_cc_cphy_rx_clk_src only defines a 400 MHz rate. > > The provider nodes are disabled by default; a board or camera overlay > enables the one(s) it uses. > > Reviewed-by: Jigarkumar Zala <jigarkumar.zala@oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> [Severity: Low] This isn't a bug, but arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi did not previously define csiphy0..2 or csiphy_opp_table. The second and third paragraphs describe changes between patch revisions (dropping the csiphy_rx clock, moving csiphy_opp_table to the root node, and dropping opp-300000000) as if modifying existing definitions in the tree, and also refer to the CSI2 PHY driver soc_cfg as a camcc driver. Should the inter-version changelog notes be moved below the --- tear line so the commit description only explains the final state being added? > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi > index 35fbee63d4c65..a66c04a1d3063 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi [ ... ] > @@ -5577,6 +5585,102 @@ cci2_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 { > }; > }; > > + csiphy0: phy@ac9c000 { > + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy"; > + reg = <0x0 0x0ac9c000 0x0 0x2000>; > + > + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>, > + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core", > + "timer"; [Severity: High] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [1], csiphy0, csiphy1, and csiphy2 declare compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy" with two clocks and no fallback compatible string such as "qcom,sa8775p-csi2-phy". In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml, only qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy and qcom,glymur-csi2-phy are documented, and three clocks (core, timer, ahb) are required: compatible: oneOf: - const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy - items: - const: qcom,glymur-csi2-phy - const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy In drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-core.c, phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_of_match_table only matches qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy, and no qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy or sa8775p soc_cfg entry exists in the driver: static const struct of_device_id phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_of_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy", .data = &mipi_csi2_dphy_4nm_x1e }, { } }; When a board or overlay enables any of csiphy0..2 and wires a sensor endpoint through it, camss_detect_legacy_phy() selects non-legacy PHY mode and msm_csiphy_subdev_init() in drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c calls devm_phy_get_by_of_node(): csiphy->phy = devm_phy_get_by_of_node(dev, remote); of_node_put(remote); if (IS_ERR(csiphy->phy)) { ret = PTR_ERR(csiphy->phy); goto done; } Without a matching PHY driver and binding schema, will dtbs_check fail on the undocumented compatible string and camss_probe() defer indefinitely with -EPROBE_DEFER whenever one of these PHY nodes is enabled? > + > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + > + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; > + > + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; > + power-domain-names = "top"; [Severity: High] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [2], csiphy0, csiphy1, and csiphy2 each specify only a single power-domains entry. When a platform device has a single power-domains phandle, platform_probe() calls dev_pm_domain_attach() -> genpd_dev_pm_attach() in drivers/pmdomain/core.c, which attaches that domain to dev->pm_domain before the driver's probe callback runs: if (of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains", "#power-domain-cells") != 1) return 0; return __genpd_dev_pm_attach(dev, dev, 0, 1, true); When phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_probe() in drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-core.c subsequently calls phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_attach_pm_domains() -> devm_pm_domain_attach_list() -> dev_pm_domain_attach_list() in drivers/base/power/common.c, it checks dev->pm_domain and fails with -EEXIST: if (dev->pm_domain) return -EEXIST; Furthermore, Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml and drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-3ph-dphy.c expect three power domains (top, mmcx, and mx). Will having a single power-domains entry cause phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_probe() to fail unconditionally with -EEXIST? [ ... ] > + csiphy2: phy@aca0000 { > + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-csi2-phy"; > + reg = <0x0 0x0aca0000 0x0 0x2000>; [ ... ] > + }; > + > camss: isp@ac78000 { > compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-camss"; [Severity: Low] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [3], this isn't a bug, but under soc@0 in arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco.dtsi, MMIO child nodes are ordered by ascending unit address. Here csiphy0 (phy@ac9c000), csiphy1 (phy@ac9e000), and csiphy2 (phy@aca0000) are placed before camss (isp@ac78000) even though 0xac9c000..0xaca0000 are higher than 0xac78000. Should csiphy0..2 be placed after camss: isp@ac78000 to maintain unit-address order? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261103221026.3662383-3-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261103221026.3662383-3-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261103221026.3662383-3-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106030212.2811027-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers 2026-11-06 3:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers for SA8775P, QCS8300 and SC7280 Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 ` Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:12 ` sashiko-bot 2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: Abel Vesa, gjorgji.rosikopulos, hariram.purushothaman, akapatra, jigarkumar.zala, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, linux-kernel Expose SC7280's five CSIPHYs as standalone qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy generic-PHY provider nodes (csiphy0..4) at their existing register addresses, each with its own OF graph (port@0 sensor-facing, port@1 CAMSS-facing) so camss_detect_legacy_phy() picks the non-legacy path once a board wires a sensor through one of them. The camss node's own reg-names/clocks/interrupts for the CSIPHYs are unchanged, so boards that don't use a provider still get the legacy binding. csiphy_opp_table moves to the root node, not inside soc@0 (a simple-bus), since it has no reg/ranges property of its own. Its opp-300000000 and opp-400000000 entries are both kept unchanged: unlike SA8775P/QCS8300, SC7280's cam_cc_cphy_rx_clk_src defines both rates. The provider nodes are disabled by default; a board or camera overlay enables the one(s) it uses. Reviewed-by: Jigarkumar Zala <jigarkumar.zala@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi index 8c7523602d27..e0e1fef7882e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi @@ -968,6 +968,18 @@ opp-128000000 { }; }; + csiphy_opp_table: opp-table-csiphy { + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; + + opp-300000000 { + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>; + }; + + opp-400000000 { + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>; + }; + }; + soc: soc@0 { #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <2>; @@ -5164,6 +5176,166 @@ cci1_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 { }; }; + csiphy0: phy@ace0000 { + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ace0000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy1: phy@ace2000 { + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ace2000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY1_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI1PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 478 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy2: phy@ace4000 { + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ace4000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY2_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI2PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 479 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy3: phy@ace6000 { + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ace6000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY3_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI3PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + + csiphy4: phy@ace8000 { + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x0ace8000 0x0 0x2000>; + + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY4_CLK>, + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI4PHYTIMER_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", + "timer"; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 122 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; + + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; + power-domain-names = "top"; + + status = "disabled"; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; + + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + }; + }; + }; + camss: isp@acb3000 { compatible = "qcom,sc7280-camss"; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi @ 2026-11-06 3:12 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-06 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Arun Nandi; +Cc: devicetree, robh, conor+dt Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: undocumented qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy compatible - [Medium] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: single power-domain on csiphy0..4 breaks probe - [Low] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: csiphy0..4 placed out of unit-address order -- commit 052b5f2483e5e0bfe39a886df72e88b30b2413ff Author: Anusha Arun Nandi <anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com> arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers This commit adds five standalone CSI2 D-PHY generic-PHY provider nodes (csiphy0 through csiphy4) and their operating points table to kodiak.dtsi for SC7280. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi > index 8c7523602d271..e0e1fef7882ec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kodiak.dtsi [ ... ] > @@ -5164,6 +5176,166 @@ cci1_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 { > }; > }; > > + csiphy0: phy@ace0000 { > + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; [Severity: Medium] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [1], is the qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy compatible string used on csiphy0 through csiphy4 documented in the Devicetree bindings or supported by a driver in the tree? In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml, only qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy and qcom,glymur-csi2-phy are listed: compatible: oneOf: - const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy - items: - const: qcom,glymur-csi2-phy - const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy Likewise, phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_of_match_table in drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-mipi-csi2-core.c only matches qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy: static const struct of_device_id phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_of_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy", .data = &mipi_csi2_dphy_4nm_x1e }, { } }; When a board or overlay enables one of csiphy0 through csiphy4 and connects a sensor through it, camss_detect_legacy_phy() selects the non-legacy PHY path and camss_init_subdevices() -> msm_csiphy_subdev_init() calls devm_phy_get_by_of_node(): csiphy->phy = devm_phy_get_by_of_node(dev, remote); of_node_put(remote); if (IS_ERR(csiphy->phy)) { ret = PTR_ERR(csiphy->phy); goto done; } Without a matching PHY driver registered for qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy, will dtbs_check fail validation and msm_csiphy_subdev_init() return -EPROBE_DEFER indefinitely? > + reg = <0x0 0x0ace0000 0x0 0x2000>; > + > + clocks = <&camcc CAM_CC_CSIPHY0_CLK>, > + <&camcc CAM_CC_CSI0PHYTIMER_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core", > + "timer"; > + > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + > + operating-points-v2 = <&csiphy_opp_table>; > + > + power-domains = <&camcc CAM_CC_TITAN_TOP_GDSC>; > + power-domain-names = "top"; [Severity: Medium] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [2], will specifying a single entry in power-domains on csiphy0 through csiphy4 cause probing with the Qualcomm MIPI CSI2 PHY driver to fail with -EEXIST? When a platform device has a single power-domains entry, platform_probe() -> dev_pm_domain_attach() -> genpd_dev_pm_attach() attaches that domain directly to dev->pm_domain before invoking the driver's probe callback: if (of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains", "#power-domain-cells") != 1) return 0; return __genpd_dev_pm_attach(dev, dev, 0, 1, true); Subsequently, phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_probe() calls phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_attach_pm_domains() -> devm_pm_domain_attach_list() -> dev_pm_domain_attach_list(), which rejects devices that already have dev->pm_domain populated: if (dev->pm_domain) return -EEXIST; In addition, shouldn't csiphy0 through csiphy4 and csiphy_opp_table also specify the RPMHPD voltage rail power domains and required-opps needed for scaling between the 300 MHz and 400 MHz OPPs in phy_qcom_mipi_csi2_set_clock_rates()? [ ... ] > + csiphy4: phy@ace8000 { > + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-csi2-phy"; > + reg = <0x0 0x0ace8000 0x0 0x2000>; [ ... ] > + }; > + > camss: isp@acb3000 { > compatible = "qcom,sc7280-camss"; [Severity: Low] As reported by Sashiko on v2 [3], this isn't a bug, but csiphy0 through csiphy4 (phy@ace0000 through phy@ace8000) are placed before camss: isp@acb3000 even though 0xace0000 is higher than 0xacb3000. Should phy@ace0000 through phy@ace8000 be placed after isp@acb3000 (and before camcc: clock-controller@ad00000) to keep the child nodes of soc@0 sorted by unit address? Also, the commit message states that csiphy_opp_table "moves to the root node" and that its entries "are both kept unchanged", which describes changes between patch revisions rather than against the baseline tree. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261103221026.3662383-4-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261103221026.3662383-4-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261103221026.3662383-4-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106030212.2811027-1-anusha.nandi@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-06 3:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-11-06 3:02 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CSI2 PHY common-phy providers for SA8775P, QCS8300 and SC7280 Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add CSI2 D-PHY common-phy providers Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:13 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: add CSI2 PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:13 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-06 3:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: add CSI2 D-PHY " Anusha Arun Nandi 2026-11-06 3:12 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox