Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] selftests/mm: separate GUP microbenchmarking from functional testing

[John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>]

On 5/28/26 10:57 PM, Sarthak Sharma wrote:
> On 5/28/26 12:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 May 2026 19:54:27 +0530 Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com> wrote:
...
> Thanks! I went through Sashiko's review.
> 
> Both the points are valid but look very minor to me: one is a temporary
> x86 build issue fixed by the next patch and the other is stricter

This is the sort of claim that an AI will make, in kernel code: "it's
just a temporary build issue". I've seen this happen during sessions
when I'm interrogating an AI about something.

Don't be misled by AI's evaluations, as unless it is guided very
firmly (sashiko for example has fairly firm guidance, although still
a work in progress) it will provide routinely terrible advice about
how to deal with the kernel.

I'm sure we have something in the "how to contribute" docs that
explain that patchsets must be bisectable and that there are no
"minor" build "issues"!

I'd request that you study those docs and the surrounding ones,
it won't take long and it will help immunize you against the
various AI suggestions that seem to be unavoidable problems in
2026.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard