[PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

[PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

[Qiuxu Zhuo]

"Please not that you *cannot* rely..." probably has a typo.
Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
---
Not sure whether it's a too small typo to need this patch.
If so, sorry for the noise. :-)

 Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
 	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
 
-	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
+	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
 	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
 	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 04:31:08PM +0800, Qiuxu Zhuo wrote:
> "Please not that you *cannot* rely..." probably has a typo.
> Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
> ---
> Not sure whether it's a too small typo to need this patch.
> If so, sorry for the noise. :-)

Not at all!  Queued for the v6.4 merge window, thank you.  (Not the
upcoming merge window, but the one after that.)

							Thanx, Paul

>  Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
>  	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
>  	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
>  
> -	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
> +	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
>  	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
>  	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>