From: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vgaarbiter: documentation grammar correction
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:38:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250204140829.7649-1-pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com> (raw)
Corrects the following grammatical issues in the VGA Arbiter documentation:
- Fixes subject-verb agreement by changing "co-exists" to "co-exist"
- Corrects pluralization by changing "server" to "servers"
- Improves sentence structure for clarity
Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst b/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst
index bde3c0afb059..d1e953712cc2 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/vgaarbiter.rst
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ Section 7, Legacy Devices.
The Resource Access Control (RAC) module inside the X server [0] existed for
the legacy VGA arbitration task (besides other bus management tasks) when more
-than one legacy device co-exists on the same machine. But the problem happens
+than one legacy device co-exist on the same machine. But the problem happens
when these devices are trying to be accessed by different userspace clients
-(e.g. two server in parallel). Their address assignments conflict. Moreover,
+(e.g. two servers in parallel). Their address assignments conflict. Moreover,
ideally, being a userspace application, it is not the role of the X server to
control bus resources. Therefore an arbitration scheme outside of the X server
is needed to control the sharing of these resources. This document introduces
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ In-kernel interface
libpciaccess
------------
-To use the vga arbiter char device it was implemented an API inside the
+To use the vga arbiter char device, an API was implemented inside the
libpciaccess library. One field was added to struct pci_device (each device
on the system)::
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 14:08 Pranav Tyagi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-07 16:53 [PATCH] vgaarbiter: documentation grammar correction Pranav Tyagi
2025-02-08 3:06 ` Bagas Sanjaya
[not found] ` <CAH4c4jKe7Q-E1LhA0KxOxEjK-gn=JY7e=2GN13X=yutaO8k3Pw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-13 17:35 ` Pranav Tyagi
2025-02-19 7:56 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-02-19 13:33 ` Simona Vetter
2025-02-23 11:44 ` Pranav Tyagi
2025-02-20 16:49 Pranav Tyagi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250204140829.7649-1-pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com \
--to=pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox